: Andreas Weiler [mailto:andreas.wei...@uni-konstanz.de]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 2:33 PM
To: Thomas Kaltofen
Cc: Christian Grün; basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
Subject: Re: [basex-talk] Performance Question
Hi Thomas,
did you try with different hard disks?
Probably the disk
-konstanz.de
Subject: Re: [basex-talk] Performance Question
Hi Thomas,
as Andreas indicated, it looks as if the hard disks need to re-adjust
to your query patterns after longer breaks; after all, I doubt that
this is something that could be fixed within BaseX. Instead, it may
help to have
On 12/13/2012 08:16 PM, Christian Grün wrote:
Hi Thomas,
some years ago, we did experiments with nio that didn’t differ too
much from conventional I/O, but we may have overseen issues, so your
input is welcome. Note, however, that nio file channels are limited to
2GB (see e.g. [1]). As a
.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 9:21 PM
To: Thomas Kaltofen
Cc: basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
Subject: Re: [basex-talk] Performance Question
On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 17:07 +, Thomas Kaltofen wrote:
I leave the server running for several hours without touching the
database
To: Thomas Kaltofen
Cc: basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
Subject: Re: [basex-talk] Performance Question
Hi Thomas,
P.S. When (approx.) do you plan to release the next version of BaseX?
It's only a few days left! As a little hint, I can already disclose
that the release will be nicknamed
Hi,
I have a question regarding performance, because my database shows a somehow
strange behavior. I have a database with around 3000 documents, the size of
each document does not really matter, because I tried it with small and big
documents and there is no real difference (total size of test
Hi Thomas,
P.S. When (approx.) do you plan to release the next version of BaseX?
It's only a few days left! As a little hint, I can already disclose
that the release will be nicknamed »BaseXMas Edition«.
I have a question regarding performance, because my database shows a somehow
strange
On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 17:07 +, Thomas Kaltofen wrote:
I leave the server running for several hours without touching the
database at all (e.g. over the night).
Most servers (especially Unix/Linux/Solaris) schedule checks overnight
that often visit every file on the system, and the
Thanks. I guess, I cannot do everything directly within XQuery, e.g.,
extending marked elements to continuous marking, to make markKorb/mark
markgeben/mark to be markKorb geben/mark -- it will be more
important for queries with ftand or ftor.
Currently, the ft:mark() and ft:extract()
Zitat von Cerstin Mahlow cerstin.mah...@unibas.ch:
I will try the Beta 7.1.
And now everything runs smoothly: I had to use the bigger machine for
creating and indexing the collection (now consisting of 677 documents
with 1.9 GB input size resulting in a 2.1 GB collection).
Opening the
Hi Cerstin,
for testing purposes you could use the ft:search function (see
http://docs.basex.org/wiki/Full-Text_Module#ft:search ). This automatically
applies the correct options.
@Christian: I could not find it on the wiki but if I remember correctyl,
the full-text would not be used, if the
Dear Cerstin,
thanks for your e-mail, and the detailed information on your use case.
To make inspection of results easier, I added ft:mark. A collection with
only a dozen of texts of about 71 MB with full text index for German,
optimized, etc. works quite well. However, the example query
12 matches
Mail list logo
