Re: [basex-talk] Status of BaseX Docker Container?

Hi Eliot, Personally, I had a hard time making Docker work on Windows machines, but we have various Docker aficionados in our team and around, so I hope they’ll give you some feedback soon. Cheers, Christian On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Eliot Kimber wrote: > I'm

Re: [basex-talk] Status of BaseX Docker Container?

OK, I'm going to proceed with making a generic basex Docker container in the DFST Docker project on GitHub. I'm using Andreas' as a starting point but it's pretty trivial. I'm working/testing on OS X, Windows, and CentOS so I should be able to get something going. Cheers, E. Eliot Kimber,

Re: [basex-talk] Status of BaseX Docker Container?

For what it's worth, I've pushed a generic BaseX HTTP container to Docker Hub as "dfst/basex". It exposes the default ports for the base and HTTP servers (1984 and 8984). >From a Linux system you connect by using the IP address of the Docker network, e.g.: http://172.17.0.2:8984/ Under Windows:

Re: [basex-talk] Status of BaseX Docker Container?

Forgot to add the Windows part: Under windows have to explicitly publish the ports when running the container: docker run --name=basex -p 8984:8984 -p 1984:1984 dfst/basex then you can use the IP address of the docker-engine VM to connect to the server: http://192.168.99.100:8984/ you can get

[basex-talk] Status of BaseX Docker Container?

I'm working toward using BaseX in a Docker container as part of the DITA for Small Teams project (we're trying to set up a system of Docker containers with all the DFST parts integrated out of the box). I notice that Andreas Jung has create a simple container here: