On Sunday 31 January 2010 08:52:57, Andres Perera wrote:
I'd like to confirm this myself,
Andres, Michelle,
if you want to help, just subscribe to the PTS page, and help
reproducing/testing bugs in different environments.
Thanks,
David
(still wondering why the RFH popped up long after it was
On 100131 00:29, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote:
I don't understand why every test has two files.
The two-files system stem from bash-completion-lib
(http://code.google.com/p/bash-completion-lib/, which I hope we can implement
soon) where tests are run twice per completion; once before dynamic
Hello,
Am 2010-01-31 09:03:00, schrieb David Paleino:
On Sunday 31 January 2010 08:52:57, Andres Perera wrote:
I'd like to confirm this myself,
Andres, Michelle,
if you want to help, just subscribe to the PTS page, and help
reproducing/testing bugs in different environments.
I am
Hello,
Am 2010-01-31 14:23:56, schrieb David Paleino:
Guess what, we're upstream, this is the upstream mailing list, and the mails
reach also !Debian people ;)
I mean upstream of the other packages...
However, I believe coordinating with maintainers is a no-go. We currently
have
158
Le 20/01/2010 22:27, Freddy Vulto a écrit :
On 100116 13:51, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Avoiding assumptions whenever possible ensure consistent results, that's
my point. The test you describe will fail, without added value to
anyone, when run by a user with a 'locanything' host in its
On Sunday 31 January 2010, Freddy Vulto wrote:
I agree with your first point though, some completions work without calling
the actual command, so it's not always necessary to test if the command is
really available.
Well, I could not find any indication of this intent, the vast majority of
