On 100425 13:18, Ville Skyttä wrote:
Does bash officially reserve any variable/function prefix to itself?
At least BASH_* and COMP_* are used in it
I've put the question on the bug-bash mailing list, see:
http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-b...@gnu.org/msg07539.html
If we're going to use
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/BashCompletion/Proposals/Roadmap
We have an item on the roadmap for introducing a namespace prefix for all
bash-completion functions. I suggest we decide whether and how to do it soon
as I'd like to get closer to a new release; there have been lots of
improvements
On Sunday 25 April 2010 12:18:26, Ville Skyttä wrote:
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/BashCompletion/Proposals/Roadmap
We have an item on the roadmap for introducing a namespace prefix for all
bash-completion functions. I suggest we decide whether and how to do it
soon as I'd like to get
On Sunday 25 April 2010, David Paleino wrote:
On Sunday 25 April 2010 12:18:26, Ville Skyttä wrote:
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/BashCompletion/Proposals/Roadmap
We have an item on the roadmap for introducing a namespace prefix for
all bash-completion functions. I suggest we decide