On Sunday 07 November 2010, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Le 31/10/2010 23:59, Freddy Vulto a écrit :
The remaining error reported by the test suite however, was that perldoc
option-completion is now missing; it's not in the pure perl perldoc
completion helper, whereas the code underneath was in
Le 07/11/2010 10:03, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
On Sunday 07 November 2010, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Le 31/10/2010 23:59, Freddy Vulto a écrit :
The remaining error reported by the test suite however, was that perldoc
option-completion is now missing; it's not in the pure perl perldoc
completion
On 101101 09:10, Ville Skyttä wrote:
I suppose something like SUBDIRS = helpers in completions/Makefile.am would
fix installing the helper (untested).
Yes, that seems to fix it.
I've added strengthen use of GNU Autotools (add to README, fix `make
distcheck`) to the roadmap as an objective for
On 100828 18:32, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
However, I'd like us to decide on a final setup, that would be:
1) FHS-compliant
2) efficient in term of time spent to source files at each new bash
process start (that's the initial goal of distinguishing between
installation and activation directory)
Le 27/08/2010 21:46, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
On Friday 27 August 2010, Freddy Vulto wrote:
I'm hesitating to add yet another configuration variable, especially
since contrib helpers are so tied together (we would also need a
BASH_COMPLETION_COMPAT_DIR_HELPER, ugh).
BTW if someone cares,
On 100825 22:58, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
That's a good idea, that would avoid install-time substitution.
However, $BASH_COMPLETION_DIR point to the directory where completions
are sourced, whereas many of us (fedora and mandriva maintainers) only
put symlinks there, and use a distinct
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:08:29 +0200, Freddy Vulto wrote:
But we could make it mandatory for BASH_COMPLETION_DIR to have a
(symlinked) `helpers' subdir? More enforcements are coming if we're
going to merge bash-completion-lib...
*We* are upstream, *we* decide. Enforcing things is one of our
