Hi Ruud.
Ruud Steltenpool:
> Looking at the incoming abstracts, plus from personal messages having an
> idea of what's still coming, i expect about every major SVG implementor
> actively participating at SVG Open 2005. However, Batik implementors are
> not among them yet :-(
>
> Please look at th
sorry, early mornings
Ruud
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Batik developer,
Looking at the incoming abstracts, plus from personal messages having an
idea of what's still coming, i expect about every major SVG implementor
actively participating at SVG Open 2005. However, Batik implementors are
not among them yet :-(
Please look at the call for partic
Cameron McCormack wrote:
Now that I think of it, and that I've done the work of creating these
extended DOM interfaces :), is there any need for them at all? If
users of the Batik DOM classes have to downcast to get access to the DOM
3 methods, why not just make them cast to one of the dom.Abstrac
