Re: flowText vs. flowRoot

2004-11-17 Thread Jamie Browning
Jim Ley wrote: Thomas DeWeese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This however is not why I have not implemented it. The reason I have yet to implement it is that the spec is _very_ unclear on how it is supposed to work. Stick with the old implementation as an

Re: flowText vs. flowRoot

2004-11-17 Thread Thomas DeWeese
Hi all, I will delivering the SVG 1.2 update soon. This will have both the 'current' SVG 1.2 flowRoot implementation as well as Batik's extension flowText element. The code has been refactored so they are independent of the core rendering engine. The plan will be to continue the existence of

Re: flowText vs. flowRoot

2004-11-15 Thread Jim Ley
Thomas DeWeese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This however is not why I have not implemented it. The reason I have yet to implement it is that the spec is _very_ unclear on how it is supposed to work. Stick with the old implementation as an extension until the WG