Re: grave completion bug in bbdb 2.2

2001-02-06 Thread Robert Fenk
On Monday, February 5 2001 23:51:15, Patrick Campbell-Preston wrote: [...] Can I be the first one to be too late to suggest that overloading bbdb-complete-name with the cycling through nets functionality is a really dumb idea? Why is it dump? IMHO it is natural and it should cycle only when

Re: grave completion bug in bbdb 2.2

2001-02-06 Thread Benjamin Rutt
Robert Fenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am not able to reproduce this with the current CVS version. Is there anyone else using the current CVS version who is able to reproduce this? yes, I am able to reproduce this with the current CVS version. For some records, a record with multiple net

Re: field weights in elided popped display (gnus)

2001-02-06 Thread Robert Fenk
On Tuesday, February 6 2001 16:38:12, Michael Hanke wrote: when I read an article of a known poster, I'd like a elided bbdb buffer to pop up (this works of course) with the 'notes' field near the top of the buffer (this doesn't work). The variable descriptions say 'notes' have a low weight

Re: Zip code bug?

2001-02-06 Thread Alex Schroeder
I propose the following documentation for the zip code related stuff in BBDB, and the transformation of some defvars into defcustom. Alex. /home/alex/elisp/bbdb $ cvs diff -u cvs server: Diffing . Index: ChangeLog === RCS file: