"Ronan" == Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ronan Xemacs at this point barfs; if I do a -debug-init, the
Ronan stack trace reveals that it's barfing on the *first line*
Ronan of my .bbdb, which is calling bbdb-initialize. I don't have
Ronan a require or anything else.
Are
Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yah; it's the gratuituous differences that annoy me. Like overlays
vs. extents, for example, and the completely incompatible menuing
systems.
Yaaahrg! I've written layers to handle both two or three times and
I'm getting s tired!
But back to this
"Alex" == Alex Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ronan Yah; it's the gratuituous differences that annoy me. Like
Ronan overlays vs. extents, for example, and the completely
Ronan incompatible menuing systems.
Alex Yaaahrg! I've written layers to handle both two or three times
Alex and I'm
On February 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
"Alex" == Alex Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then why doesn't someone write two really good layers -- one to
XEmacsify FSF code, and one to FSFify XEmacs code -- and save us all
the trouble?
Have a look at sysdep.el (?) as included in w3 the
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Ronan Waide wrote:
On February 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I think that it should be possible to load and reload all lisp files
to you heart's content. Therefore I suggest you remove it and see
wether it breaks. My guess is, nothing breaks.
The check is inserted by
