Eric Abrahamsen writes:
> "Roland Winkler" writes:
>
>> On Sat Sep 5 2015 Roland Winkler wrote:
>>> On Thu Sep 3 2015 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>>> > Basically it does what it says: if point is on a record name, the
>>> > whole record is copied, like before. If point is on a particular
>>> > field,
"Roland Winkler" writes:
> On Sat Sep 5 2015 Roland Winkler wrote:
>> On Thu Sep 3 2015 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>> > Basically it does what it says: if point is on a record name, the
>> > whole record is copied, like before. If point is on a particular
>> > field, the value (but not label) of that
On Sat Sep 5 2015 Roland Winkler wrote:
> On Thu Sep 3 2015 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> > Basically it does what it says: if point is on a record name, the
> > whole record is copied, like before. If point is on a particular
> > field, the value (but not label) of that field is copied.
>
> I am just
On Thu Sep 3 2015 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> Basically it does what it says: if point is on a record name, the
> whole record is copied, like before. If point is on a particular
> field, the value (but not label) of that field is copied.
I am just trying to understand a typical usage pattern for the
I've always wanted a function for easily copying the values of record
fields.
The attached patch replaces the `bbdb-copy-records-as-kill' function
with a new function, `bbdb-copy-records-or-fields-as-kill'.
Basically it does what it says: if point is on a record name, the whole
record is copied,