Re: [BBDB] ChangeLog 2012-07-06

2012-07-08 Thread Stephen Leake
Sam Steingold s...@gnu.org writes: Can you explain why you want to override your choice for bbdb-message-all-addresses in this function? when I try to edit a field when bbdb-message-all-addresses is t, the record being edited is the first record displayed, not the record of the sender. I

Re: [BBDB] ChangeLog 2012-07-06

2012-07-08 Thread Sam Steingold
* Stephen Leake fgrcura_yr...@fgrcur-yrnxr.bet [2012-07-08 03:49:02 -0400]: Sam Steingold s...@gnu.org writes: Can you explain why you want to override your choice for bbdb-message-all-addresses in this function? when I try to edit a field when bbdb-message-all-addresses is t, the record

Re: [BBDB] ChangeLog 2012-07-06

2012-07-08 Thread Stephen Leake
Sam Steingold s...@gnu.org writes: (snip discussing bbdb-message-all-addresses) I want all the relevant records for a message displayed, I guess when bbdb pops up automatically for a message. but when I hit ;, I want to edit the record of the sender, not the first record displayed. Ok,

Re: [BBDB] ChangeLog 2012-07-06

2012-07-07 Thread Roland Winkler
On Sat Jul 7 2012 Stephen Leake wrote: Sam Steingold s...@gnu.org writes: Could you please explain to me how to do this? Use ad-add-advice on bbdb-mua-edit-field; see the elisp manual for more info. That's one possibility. I mentioned another possibility previously: On Thu Mar 15 2012

Re: [BBDB] ChangeLog 2012-07-06

2012-07-07 Thread Sam Steingold
* Roland Winkler jvax...@tah.bet [2012-07-07 04:44:10 -0500]: On Fri Jul 6 2012 Sam Steingold wrote: Your general design decisions broke well-documented behavior that has been around since v 1.50. Are you sure these decisions were well thought-through? Some time ago you wrote On Fri Dec

Re: [BBDB] ChangeLog 2012-07-06

2012-07-07 Thread Sam Steingold
* Stephen Leake fgrcura_yr...@fgrcur-yrnxr.bet [2012-07-07 01:55:24 -0400]: Sam Steingold s...@gnu.org writes: * Roland Winkler jvax...@tah.bet [2012-07-06 12:06:27 -0500]: On Fri Jul 6 2012 Sam Steingold wrote: 2012-07-06 Sam Steingold s...@gnu.org * lisp/bbdb-mua.el

Re: [BBDB] ChangeLog 2012-07-06

2012-07-06 Thread Sam Steingold
2012-06-28 Sam Steingold s...@gnu.org * lisp/bbdb-com.el (bbdb-complete-mail): Use `quit-window' instead of `bury-buffer' to get rid of *Completions*. -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on Ubuntu 12.04 (precise) X 11.0.11103000 http://www.childpsy.net/ http://iris.org.il

Re: [BBDB] ChangeLog 2012-07-06

2012-07-06 Thread Sam Steingold
* Roland Winkler jvax...@tah.bet [2012-07-06 12:06:27 -0500]: On Fri Jul 6 2012 Sam Steingold wrote: 2012-07-06 Sam Steingold s...@gnu.org * lisp/bbdb-mua.el (bbdb-mua-edit-field): Edit THE record for THE sender, not all the relevant records. I do not want to fix the values of

Re: [BBDB] ChangeLog 2012-07-06

2012-07-06 Thread Roland Winkler
2012-07-06 Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org * lisp/bbdb-com.el (bbdb-complete-mail): Use window-live-p. 2012-07-06 Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org * lisp/bbdb-mua.el (bbdb-mua-edit-field): Revert previous change. Do not use hard-coded bindings for user variables. BBDB

Re: [BBDB] ChangeLog 2012-07-06

2012-07-06 Thread Stephen Leake
Sam Steingold s...@gnu.org writes: * Roland Winkler jvax...@tah.bet [2012-07-06 12:06:27 -0500]: On Fri Jul 6 2012 Sam Steingold wrote: 2012-07-06 Sam Steingold s...@gnu.org * lisp/bbdb-mua.el (bbdb-mua-edit-field): Edit THE record for THE sender, not all the relevant records. I