On Tuesday, September 4 2001 00:29:09, Alex Schroeder wrote:
[...]
I am really starting to like this!
:) Well it still needs a helping hand ...
One question: The default value here contains phones instead of
phone -- does that work?
Yes, since it maps to a function bbdb-record-fieldname
Here are some alternatives for a bbdb-display-layout-alist
customization widgets. I prefer the last one myself.
I stopped fiddling with it before implementing the availability
restriction of properties depending on layout type. :)
Alex.
(defcustom bbdb-display-layout-alist
'((one-line
Robert Fenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have just committed a rewritten version of the
bbdb-format-record-* functions.
I am really starting to like this!
One question: The default value here contains phones instead of
phone -- does that work? My head is spinning while looking at all
the
Hi,
I have just committed a rewritten version of the
bbdb-format-record-* functions.
The lookfeel of the different layouts and be configured
by the variables bbdb-display-layout-alist, which lists
options for the specific layout, e.g. field order, omited
fields, toggeling,... and the variables
