Re: cvs ci 'bbdb/lisp bbdb-com.el,1.110,1.111'

2001-06-11 Thread Alex Schroeder
Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ideally the address editing function should return a true or false value (for valid/invalid data) and the calling code should handle that appropriately - by which I mean if you're editing an address, it remains unchanged, and if you're adding an address,

Re: cvs ci 'bbdb/lisp bbdb-com.el,1.110,1.111'

2001-06-10 Thread Alex Schroeder
Waider [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: (bbdb-address-edit-default): If no data is entered for the address, enter a spurious country name. This is a temporary hack to get around a problem in address display when the address has no data. Hi Waider, What is the problem, exactly? Seeing this I

Re: cvs ci 'bbdb/lisp bbdb-com.el,1.110,1.111'

2001-06-10 Thread Alex Schroeder
Alex Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What is the problem, exactly? Seeing this I am not sure wether I should upgrade. I have many people in my .bbdb without addresses (and I have never noticed any significant bugs in address display). Curious minds want to know. :) Ah... sorry for

Re: cvs ci 'bbdb/lisp bbdb-com.el,1.110,1.111'

2001-06-10 Thread Ronan Waide
On June 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Alex Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What is the problem, exactly? Seeing this I am not sure wether I should upgrade. I have many people in my .bbdb without addresses (and I have never noticed any significant bugs in address display). Curious