RE: notes field edition

2014-01-04 Thread Roland Winkler
On Thu Jan 2 2014 Vincent Belaïche wrote: The problem is some sort of inconsistency. When I did bbdb-create notes was proposed, so it looks like some default field If you customize the new variable bbdb-default-xfield, bbdb-create will use any xfield you like. --- this is all the more true

RE: notes field edition

2014-01-02 Thread Vincent Belaïche
By the way: happy new year 2014 and many thanks for BBDB v3.    Vincent. From: vincent@hotmail.fr To: wink...@gnu.org CC: bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: notes field edition Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 14:57:53 +0100 The problem is some

RE: notes field edition

2013-12-29 Thread Vincent Belaïche
It seems that for some reason my answers are blocked somewhere in the pipe... Vincent. Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 07:30:32 + Subject: Re: notes field edition From: ba...@cs.nuim.ie To: wink...@gnu.org CC: bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net; vincent@hotmail.fr On 27 Dec 2013 03:49

RE: notes field edition

2013-12-29 Thread Roland Winkler
On Fri Dec 27 2013 Vincent Belaïche wrote: From this info node: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/bbdb.html#SEC33 I can read: --- ; (bbdb-edit-notes) A shortcut for editing the notes field.

RE: notes field edition

2013-12-27 Thread Vincent Belaïche
-insert-field will propose `notes' like a field. Maybe there is a misunderstanding by me about what notes are. Vincent Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 07:30:32 + Subject: Re: notes field edition From: ba...@cs.nuim.ie To: wink...@gnu.org CC: bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net; vincent

notes field edition

2013-12-26 Thread Vincent Belaïche
Hello, It seems that the old keybinding `;' does not work any longer, and when using `i' to insert a field, `notes' is not part of the pre-defined fields. Not sure whether that is a bug or not... Vincent. -- Rapidly

Re: notes field edition

2013-12-26 Thread Roland Winkler
On Thu Dec 26 2013 Vincent Belaïche wrote: It seems that the old keybinding `;' does not work any longer, and when using `i' to insert a field, `notes' is not part of the pre-defined fields. I am sorry, I can only guess what you are talking about. In which context are you missing a binding of

Re: notes field edition

2013-12-26 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
On 27 Dec 2013 03:49, Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org wrote: I am sorry, I can only guess what you are talking about. In which context are you missing a binding of `;' to which command? Is there a solution you want to propose? I'd assume he means that, in pretty much any context in which bbdb