On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
(sorry I can't find the message for credit purposes) responded with
the following for .emacs, which works:
(unload-feature 'bbdb-autoloads t)
(bbdb-initialize)
Good stuff. Thankfully, we've gotten rid of the problem for the next
BBDB release, but
Okay, this is officially irritating me.
1. Why is xemacs telling me that bbdb-autoloads is already loaded,
when I have nothing to load it in my .emacs?
2. Why is it a fatal error to load bbdb-autoloads twice? If this is a
"my version vs. your version issue, wouldn't it be more sensible
On February 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Shouldn't you be able to `require' rather that `load' it?
Daniel
That appears to work, yes. Going into CVS shortly.
Waider. Along with a buncha other stuff, whee!
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
I really need to
"Ronan" == Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ronan Xemacs at this point barfs; if I do a -debug-init, the
Ronan stack trace reveals that it's barfing on the *first line*
Ronan of my .bbdb, which is calling bbdb-initialize. I don't have
Ronan a require or anything else.
Are
Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yah; it's the gratuituous differences that annoy me. Like overlays
vs. extents, for example, and the completely incompatible menuing
systems.
Yaaahrg! I've written layers to handle both two or three times and
I'm getting s tired!
But back to this
"Alex" == Alex Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ronan Yah; it's the gratuituous differences that annoy me. Like
Ronan overlays vs. extents, for example, and the completely
Ronan incompatible menuing systems.
Alex Yaaahrg! I've written layers to handle both two or three times
Alex and I'm
On February 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
"Alex" == Alex Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then why doesn't someone write two really good layers -- one to
XEmacsify FSF code, and one to FSFify XEmacs code -- and save us all
the trouble?
Have a look at sysdep.el (?) as included in w3 the
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Ronan Waide wrote:
On February 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I think that it should be possible to load and reload all lisp files
to you heart's content. Therefore I suggest you remove it and see
wether it breaks. My guess is, nothing breaks.
The check is inserted by
Okay, this is officially irritating me.
1. Why is xemacs telling me that bbdb-autoloads is already loaded,
when I have nothing to load it in my .emacs?
2. Why is it a fatal error to load bbdb-autoloads twice? If this is a
"my version vs. your version issue, wouldn't it be more sensible
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Ronan Waide wrote:
Okay, this is officially irritating me.
1. Why is xemacs telling me that bbdb-autoloads is already loaded,
when I have nothing to load it in my .emacs?
If you have the package installed, it's probably done by the packaging
system to ensure that the
On February 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If you have the package installed, it's probably done by the packaging
system to ensure that the autoload functions are available.
Packages are designed to be available (autoloads only) when they are
installed, IIRC.
Okay; that's not solving the
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Ronan Waide wrote:
On February 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[...]
Oh dear. I've just realised what the problem is. bbdb-initialize does
(load "bbdb-autoloads"), IIRC. D'oh. I'm leaving the above text to
show you that I am an idiot who misses the obvious from time to
12 matches
Mail list logo
