Re: Replacing Gnus nnmail-split-fancy badness with bbdb goodness

2001-02-13 Thread Jack Twilley
"Adam" == Adam C Finnefrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Adam I only use gnus-private, so that I can have per-user sorting, Adam without an regexp entry for each person in BBDB. So each related BBDB entry has a gnus-private tag, right? That'll handle "other mail" and "people" in my example

Re: Replacing Gnus nnmail-split-fancy badness with bbdb goodness

2001-01-29 Thread Ronan Waide
On January 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: NB: for some reason, byte-compiling bbdb-gnus.el broke this for me. Removing the bbdb-gnus.elc fixed the problem. Can you reproduce this, and give me a stack trace? I don't use Gnus for mailreading myself, so I don't generally have an opportunity to play

Replacing Gnus nnmail-split-fancy badness with bbdb goodness

2001-01-26 Thread Jack Twilley
I've got a brutally ugly and hard-to-maintain nnmail-split-fancy variable in my .gnus file and I vaguely remember someone having documented some way to add something to a bbdb record, and then have gnus magically file emails sent to that person into the right folder. Does this exist? Am I

Re: Replacing Gnus nnmail-split-fancy badness with bbdb goodness

2001-01-26 Thread James Felix Black
There's a fairly ancient package called gnus-bbdb.el floating around that works for me; you define a field in the bbdb record that directs gnus to file the mail. It works fine, but doesn't currently play nice with fancy splitting. Here's a URL: