I'd like to heartily endorse the inclusion of Marco's patch. (I just
debugged this today and came up with the same fix; then I found this
email.)
The patch is a very minor fix for a bug that detracts significantly from
bbdb functionality. Without the patch, bbdb-omit-record does not work,
since bb
"Roland Winkler" writes:
>
> When my updates of BBDB were in a pre-alpha stage and I did not yet
> have a detailed roadmap where they would take me, I thought that
> there was really not much of a point trying to continuously (at each
> intermediate stage) preserve backward compatibility when it w
Leo writes:
> On 2011-04-04 10:31 +0800, Matt Lundin wrote:
>>> When my updates of BBDB were in a pre-alpha stage and I did not yet
>>> have a detailed roadmap where they would take me, I thought that
>>> there was really not much of a point trying to continuously (
Roland Winkler writes:
> On Mon Apr 4 2011 Leo wrote:
>> I personally think it would be far more productive to worry about
>> backward compatibility later on. For example, we could add a new
>> org-bbdb3 module to org mode and leave the old as it is.
>
> While I do not know any details of how BBD
"Roland Winkler" writes:
> On Sat May 14 2011 Johnny wrote:
>> I have set up an org-agenda that includes anniversaries in the agenda
>> view from the bbdb database, but this breaks with bbdb 3.02 giving the
>> error 'bad sexp'.
>>
>> I set up the agenda file using (from org-mode 6.33x info sectio
"Roland Winkler" writes:
> On Sun May 15 2011 Matt Lundin wrote:
>> I'd be happy to take this on. AFAICT, there are three functions in
>> org-bbdb that no longer exist in bbdb v3.
>>
>> bbdb-name
>> bbdb-company
>> bbdb-record-getprop
>&g
Leo writes:
> On 2011-05-16 00:58 +0800, Matt Lundin wrote:
>> I'd be happy to take this on. AFAICT, there are three functions in
>> org-bbdb that no longer exist in bbdb v3.
>
> If you want you can build on top of my version. The anniversaries is
> still broken si
Philipp Haselwarter writes:
> On 2011-05-16 14:08 UT, Matt Lundin wrote:
>
> ML> I have anniversaries working in my own setup, so between the two
> ML> sets of modifications, I should be able to provide a full set of
> ML> fixes.More soon...
>
> Would you mind sh
