well, same issue:
ssb: Sonics Silicon Backplane found on PCI device :00:02.0
ssb: Core 0 found: ChipCommon (cc 0x800, rev 0x02, vendor 0x4243)
ssb: Core 1 found: IEEE 802.11 (cc 0x812, rev 0x04, vendor 0x4243)
ssb: Core 2 found: PCMCIA (cc 0x80D, rev 0x01, vendor 0x4243)
ssb: Core 3 found: V90
Gábor Stefanik wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Daniel Schmitt
dan...@schmitt-united.de wrote:
Hello Group,
I posted a few days ago my problems with this WLAN minipci card:
Linux OpenWrt 2.6.28.10 #5 Thu Sep 10 20:36:33 CEST 2009 armv5teb unknown
00:02.0 0280: 14e4:4325 (rev 02)
Larry, I don't think that sprom_do_read is able to read _ANY_ valid data
because
if I do it today it results it
r...@openwrt:/# insmod ssb
ssb: Core 0 found: ChipCommon (cc 0x800, rev 0x02, vendor 0x4243)
ssb: Core 1 found: IEEE 802.11 (cc 0x812, rev 0x04, vendor 0x4243)
ssb: Core 2 found:
On Monday 14 September 2009 18:56:08 Daniel Schmitt wrote:
well, same issue:
ssb: Sonics Silicon Backplane found on PCI device :00:02.0
ssb: Core 0 found: ChipCommon (cc 0x800, rev 0x02, vendor 0x4243)
ssb: Core 1 found: IEEE 802.11 (cc 0x812, rev 0x04, vendor 0x4243)
ssb: Core 2 found:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Michael Buesch m...@bu3sch.de wrote:
On Monday 14 September 2009 18:56:08 Daniel Schmitt wrote:
well, same issue:
ssb: Sonics Silicon Backplane found on PCI device :00:02.0
ssb: Core 0 found: ChipCommon (cc 0x800, rev 0x02, vendor 0x4243)
ssb: Core 1
Michael Buesch schrieb:
On Monday 14 September 2009 18:56:08 Daniel Schmitt wrote:
well, same issue:
ssb: Sonics Silicon Backplane found on PCI device :00:02.0
ssb: Core 0 found: ChipCommon (cc 0x800, rev 0x02, vendor 0x4243)
ssb: Core 1 found: IEEE 802.11 (cc 0x812, rev 0x04, vendor
Michael Buesch schrieb:
On Monday 14 September 2009 20:35:42 Daniel Schmitt wrote:
Michael Buesch schrieb:
On Monday 14 September 2009 18:56:08 Daniel Schmitt wrote:
well, same issue:
ssb: Sonics Silicon Backplane found on PCI device :00:02.0
ssb: Core 0 found: ChipCommon (cc 0x800, rev
diff -uNr compat-wireless-2009-09-14/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_a.c compat-wireless-2009-09-14.mod/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_a.c
--- compat-wireless-2009-09-14/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_a.c 2009-09-14 06:14:18.0 +0200
+++
On Monday 14 September 2009 20:44:54 Thomas Ilnseher wrote:
*) Please inline the patch
*) Why do you rename b43_phyop_switch_analog_generic? It's generic, because
it works on the generic PHY0 MMIO register shadow.
*) Please use b43_phy_mask and b43_phy_set.
--
Greetings, Michael.
The generic analog switch routine is not correct for LP-PHY according
to the latest specs. Implement the proper analog core switch routine.
Signed-off-by: Gábor Stefanik netrolller...@gmail.com
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
index
On Mo, 2009-09-14 at 20:51 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Monday 14 September 2009 20:44:54 Thomas Ilnseher wrote:
*) Please inline the patch
*) Why do you rename b43_phyop_switch_analog_generic? It's generic, because
it works on the generic PHY0 MMIO register shadow.
It's renamed
On Mo, 2009-09-14 at 21:10 +0200, Gábor Stefanik wrote:
The generic analog switch routine is not correct for LP-PHY according
to the latest specs. Implement the proper analog core switch routine.
Signed-off-by: Gábor Stefanik netrolller...@gmail.com
---
diff --git
As I've seen Gàbor's patch, I noticed that my previous patch was
bullshit. This patch should work:
Signed-off-by: Thomas Ilnseher il...@gmx.de
diff -uNr b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
--- b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c 2009-09-14 06:14:18.0
On Monday 14 September 2009 21:10:04 Gábor Stefanik wrote:
The generic analog switch routine is not correct for LP-PHY according
to the latest specs. Implement the proper analog core switch routine.
Signed-off-by: Gábor Stefanik netrolller...@gmail.com
---
diff --git
On Monday 14 September 2009 21:10:32 Thomas Ilnseher wrote:
On Mo, 2009-09-14 at 20:51 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Monday 14 September 2009 20:44:54 Thomas Ilnseher wrote:
*) Please inline the patch
*) Why do you rename b43_phyop_switch_analog_generic? It's generic,
On Mo, 2009-09-14 at 21:43 +0200, Gábor Stefanik wrote:
Always send patches to John Linville, and CC linux-wireless.
Ok, the last try ...
As I've seen Gàbor's patch, I noticed that my previous patch was
bullshit. This patch should work:
(see: http://bcm-v4.sipsolutions.net/802.11/PHY/Anacore)
Thomas Ilnseher wrote:
On Mo, 2009-09-14 at 21:43 +0200, Gábor Stefanik wrote:
Always send patches to John Linville, and CC linux-wireless.
Ok, the last try ...
As I've seen Gàbor's patch, I noticed that my previous patch was
bullshit. This patch should work:
(see:
On Monday 14 September 2009 22:22:57 Thomas Ilnseher wrote:
I can now confirm that the patch below DOES compile, and even works.
So can you send a version which conforms to our patch submission standards as
larry explained?
--
Greetings, Michael.
The current verison of b43 uses b43_phyop_switch_analog_generic for A,
G and LP phys.
According to the spec, this is the wrong behaviour for the LP PHY
(see: http://bcm-v4.sipsolutions.net/802.11/PHY/Anacore )
While no problems on the x86 plattform where seen, this leads to a crash
on the
On Monday 14 September 2009 23:01:33 Thomas Ilnseher wrote:
The current verison of b43 uses b43_phyop_switch_analog_generic for A,
G and LP phys.
According to the spec, this is the wrong behaviour for the LP PHY
(see: http://bcm-v4.sipsolutions.net/802.11/PHY/Anacore )
While no problems
Don't abuse wl-current_dev in the LED work for checking whether we're
going down. Add an explicit variable.
This fixes a crash on rmmod dereferencing the wl-current_dev NULL pointer
in various other places of the driver.
Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch m...@bu3sch.de
---
Note to self: Don't try
Michael Buesch wrote:
Don't abuse wl-current_dev in the LED work for checking whether we're
going down. Add an explicit variable.
This fixes a crash on rmmod dereferencing the wl-current_dev NULL pointer
in various other places of the driver.
Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch m...@bu3sch.de
Daniel Lenski wrote:
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Daniel Lenski dlen...@gmail.com wrote:
I have not found any other source of these, unfortunately. I am happy
to send the extracted firmware to developers off-list if desired.
Linksys's less-than-helpful GPL source code page gives no
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 22:01 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
I tried it on the file above and got the following:
fin...@larrylap:~/WAG54GX2 ~/sprom/b43_fwcutter.py
src.GPL/driver/2.6.8.1/extra/wl.ko
Firmware md5sum is 4f1218df93c23b4e27c83cb208031a1d...
Extracting a0g0bsinitvals2 of length 0x10
24 matches
Mail list logo
