On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:41:48 +0100
Gábor Stefanik netrolller...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone should test the following:
-Open drivers/ssb/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c
-In ssb_pmu_init, replace 0x4325 with 0x4312. (This is not the correct
way to fix this, but should be enough for a test. The correct fix
2010/2/9 Michael Buesch m...@bu3sch.de:
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 21:04:40 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
---
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_common.c | 11 +++
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_common.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0
2010/2/10 Michael Buesch m...@bu3sch.de:
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 21:04:33 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
+#define B43_MMIO_PSM_PHY_HDR 0x492 /* programmable state machine
*/
The comment doesn't make a lot of sense.
In case you don't know, the PSM is the part of the hardware
that
John: there is one patch less in comparision to first patchset, previous try
was some time ago, so fianlly I decided to resend all patches. I guess half
of them did not really changed. Are you fine with this?
Rafał Miłecki (10):
b43: N-PHY: add some registers and structs definitions
b43:
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
---
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c | 37 -
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
index 795bb1e..2d8eda1 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
---
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c | 50 --
1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
index 2d8eda1..dd81e8a 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
---
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c | 45 +
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.h | 11 +
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
---
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c | 58 +-
1 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
index 1952acc..30f8bf2 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
---
V2: unconditional flush
---
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c | 23 +--
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
index 30f8bf2..ffe2622
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
---
V2: use general SHM write
---
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c | 62 ++
1 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
index
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
---
V2: fix typo
---
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c | 87 +++---
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.h |1 +
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
---
V2: dropped obvious comment
---
drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h |1 +
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.h |9 +
drivers/net/wireless/b43/tables_nphy.h |9 +
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
---
V2: unconditional flushes
---
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c | 54 ++---
1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
index
On Friday 26 February 2010 23:03:28 Gábor Stefanik wrote:
BTW there is an interesting difference in the early init between wl
and b43: b43 sets bit 0x200 in core register 0x600, while wl sets
0x8000 in register 0x280a - an undocumented register.
Well, it is not only undocumented, it's also far
On Saturday 27 February 2010 02:41:48 Gábor Stefanik wrote:
Someone should test the following:
-Open drivers/ssb/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c
-In ssb_pmu_init, replace 0x4325 with 0x4312.
Uh, wait a second. Do _all_ cards that show the behavior have a PMU on the SSB?
If so, you should really make
On Saturday 27 February 2010 12:12:23 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
2010/2/10 Michael Buesch m...@bu3sch.de:
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 21:04:33 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
+#define B43_MMIO_PSM_PHY_HDR 0x492 /* programmable state
machine */
The comment doesn't make a lot of sense.
In
On Saturday 27 February 2010 12:09:30 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
2010/2/9 Michael Buesch m...@bu3sch.de:
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 21:04:40 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
---
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_common.c | 11 +++
On 02/27/2010 09:16 AM, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Friday 26 February 2010 23:03:28 Gábor Stefanik wrote:
BTW there is an interesting difference in the early init between wl
and b43: b43 sets bit 0x200 in core register 0x600, while wl sets
0x8000 in register 0x280a - an undocumented register.
On 02/27/2010 09:20 AM, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Saturday 27 February 2010 02:41:48 Gábor Stefanik wrote:
Someone should test the following:
-Open drivers/ssb/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c
-In ssb_pmu_init, replace 0x4325 with 0x4312.
Uh, wait a second. Do _all_ cards that show the behavior have
On Saturday 27 February 2010 16:55:09 Larry Finger wrote:
On 02/27/2010 09:16 AM, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Friday 26 February 2010 23:03:28 Gábor Stefanik wrote:
BTW there is an interesting difference in the early init between wl
and b43: b43 sets bit 0x200 in core register 0x600, while wl
On Saturday 27 February 2010 17:05:41 Larry Finger wrote:
On 02/27/2010 09:20 AM, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Saturday 27 February 2010 02:41:48 Gábor Stefanik wrote:
Someone should test the following:
-Open drivers/ssb/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c
-In ssb_pmu_init, replace 0x4325 with 0x4312.
On 02/27/2010 10:08 AM, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Saturday 27 February 2010 17:05:41 Larry Finger wrote:
On 02/27/2010 09:20 AM, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Saturday 27 February 2010 02:41:48 Gábor Stefanik wrote:
Someone should test the following:
-Open drivers/ssb/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c
-In
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Larry Finger larry.fin...@lwfinger.net wrote:
On 02/27/2010 10:08 AM, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Saturday 27 February 2010 17:05:41 Larry Finger wrote:
On 02/27/2010 09:20 AM, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Saturday 27 February 2010 02:41:48 Gábor Stefanik wrote:
2010/2/27 Nathan Schulte rekl...@gmail.com:
I've been following along with the linux-wireless thread, and wanted
to bring up a few points.
1) If the report in reference by Gábor: Well, we have a report from
someone with an Intel T7250, ... is mine, note that my processor is
actually a T5670
On Saturday 27 February 2010 20:45:50 Gábor Stefanik wrote:
2. Just before the SPROM readout, we are missing a Set 0x8000 in
MMIO offset 0x280a. This looks curiously like PCI-E Miscellaneous
Configuration, from http://bcm-v4.sipsolutions.net/PCI-E - and
indeed, the value read out from
On 02/27/2010 01:45 PM, Gábor Stefanik wrote:
So, a quick status update, from what I've found yesterday:
1. We get the PMU setup wrong. Bit 0x200 is being set, despite the
PMU being rev1. Also, PMU setup is done too early - at least wl reads
the SPROM before setting up the PMU. A write
2010/2/28 Nathan Schulte rekl...@gmail.com:
2010/2/27 Gábor Stefanik netrolller...@gmail.com:
OK, I whipped up a quick test patch with changes found so far
implemented. Please test if this improves the situation.
Where can I find this patch?
-Nate
Oops... yes, I forgot it. Here it is!
--
2010/2/28 Nathan Schulte rekl...@gmail.com:
2010/2/27 Gábor Stefanik netrolller...@gmail.com:
Oops... yes, I forgot it. Here it is!
No luck from me either.
And by the way, Lucas and I have the exact same hardware, so his is
indeed a T5670 as well.
-Nate
Are you sure it is exactly the
28 matches
Mail list logo
