Hi,
I got an asus WL520GU (with LP PHY).
Unfortunately, even the specs on bcm-v4 are quite incomplete yet.
Is there any ETA when specs are complete, when prelimanry support is added
(offset to previous date, of course) ?
I'm trying to read the code of phy.c, but there are still some things that
/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
--
Thomas Ilnseher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
things.
--
Thomas Ilnseher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
Hi! It's my first post to bcm-43xx list. I searching about bcm4328
device without ndiswrapper, but i didn't found anything. Can you
tell me about this? thanks
No bcm4328 support so far, we are working on that. Don't ask. There
is NO support!, I'm not a developer, but this is the message
.
--
Thomas Ilnseher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
Happy new year to all of You!
Cheers,
Thomas
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
Am Donnerstag, den 22.01.2009, 10:26 +0100 schrieb Holger Schurig:
Just found this in the Android's repository and think maybe
this info can be useful for someone in this list:
http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/system/wlan/broadcom
.git;a=summary
.. and it's even GPL. :-)
but
Am Donnerstag, den 22.01.2009, 11:04 +0100 schrieb Rafał Miłecki:
2009/1/22 Otto Solares so...@guug.org:
FYI:
Just found this in the Android's repository and think maybe this info
can be useful for someone in this list:
Am Dienstag, den 03.03.2009, 14:30 +0100 schrieb Henning Holtschneider:
Hello everybody,
I'm trying to use the b43 driver on a Broadcom 5354 SoC platform
running OpenWRT SVN Trunk (Linux kernel 2.6.28.7). When loading the
driver, I get:
b43-phy0: Broadcom 5354 WLAN found (core
On Mo, 2009-05-11 at 00:53 +0530, Harshil Doshi wrote:
hi my name is harshil doshi
i have a request as how am i supposed to un-subscribe...pls help
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
Hi!
Click the link below:
Hi List,
I installed the latest version of OpenWRT on a ASUS WL-520GU.
I compiles a few kernel patches to make the OpenWRT kernel (2.6.28.10)
compatible with compat wireless.
Than I patched OpenWRT to build compat-wireless-09-02
As said, It yields an instant crash:
cfg80211: World regulatory
On Sa, 2009-09-12 at 00:56 +0200, Gábor Stefanik wrote:
2009/9/12 Gábor Stefanik netrolller...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Thomas Ilnseher il...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi List,
I installed the latest version of OpenWRT on a ASUS WL-520GU.
I compiles a few kernel patches to make
On So, 2009-09-13 at 19:05 +0200, Daniel Schmitt wrote:
Does anybody know what I can change in OpenWRT relating to PCI options for
WP188?
That maybe totally off topic, but:
I fiddled a bit with getting wireless running on an ASUS WL-520GU
router. I noticed the following:
OpenWRT's mac80211
@ bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain, max_eirp)
(2402000 KHz - 2483500 KHz @ 4 KHz), (N/A, 2000 mBm)
usb 1-1: usbfs: interface 0 claimed by usbfs while 'saned' sets config
#1
On Sa, 2009-09-12 at 12:38 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Saturday 12 September 2009 02:32:55 Thomas Ilnseher
diff -uNr compat-wireless-2009-09-14/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_a.c compat-wireless-2009-09-14.mod/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_a.c
--- compat-wireless-2009-09-14/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_a.c 2009-09-14 06:14:18.0 +0200
+++
On Mo, 2009-09-14 at 20:51 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Monday 14 September 2009 20:44:54 Thomas Ilnseher wrote:
*) Please inline the patch
*) Why do you rename b43_phyop_switch_analog_generic? It's generic, because
it works on the generic PHY0 MMIO register shadow.
It's renamed
On Mo, 2009-09-14 at 21:10 +0200, Gábor Stefanik wrote:
The generic analog switch routine is not correct for LP-PHY according
to the latest specs. Implement the proper analog core switch routine.
Signed-off-by: Gábor Stefanik netrolller...@gmail.com
---
diff --git
As I've seen Gàbor's patch, I noticed that my previous patch was
bullshit. This patch should work:
Signed-off-by: Thomas Ilnseher il...@gmx.de
diff -uNr b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
--- b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c 2009-09-14 06:14:18.0
)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Ilnseher il...@gmx.de
diff -uNr b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
--- b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c 2009-09-14 06:14:18.0
+0200
+++ a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c 2009-09-14 21:03:15.158507573
+0200
@@ -2228,6 +2228,16
on the BCM5354 SoC (MIPS 32 LE plattform).
This patch implements the analog switch for LP PHYs according to the
specs. It fixes the crash
signed-off-by: Thomas Ilnseher il...@gmx.de
---
diff -uNr b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
--- b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c 2009
Hello Michael, Gábor Larry,
I tried to implement the lpphy_update_tx_power_npt function according to
the specs. Please review this patch (I don't want to annoy Linville with
100 different versions of this patch).
Please note: I can verify it compiles, but it is UNTESTED (right now,
lack of
I implemented the functions:
lpphy_update_tx_power_npt
and
lpphy_set_tx_power_control,
and together, both improve the bitrate of my device:
wlan0 IEEE 802.11bg ESSID:tommy
Mode:Managed Frequency:2.412 GHz Access Point: XXX
Bit Rate=54 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
The lpphy_update_tx_power_npt routine is currently missing in the code.
I added the routine according to the specs.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Ilnseher il...@gmx.de
---
diff -uNr compat-wireless-2009-09-15/drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h
compat-wireless-2009-09-15.mod/drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h
Put a printk here to see if this branch is getting hit.
(BTW, are you loading b43 with the hwpctl modparam? That enables
experimental HW TX power control support, which might explain what you
were seeing.)
Hi Gabor,
I'm stupid.
I applied 3 Patches, the analog switch patch, and the other
Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2009, 18:02 +0200 schrieb Rafał Miłecki:
Hi,
I would like to ask about status of LP-PHY status. Could you explain
to simple end-user what is missing in current implementation? Is this
just calibration for performance, or something more? Did someone make
some tests
On Do, 2009-10-22 at 17:06 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
+ static int count;
count is declared, and incremented, but never set to 0. I guess this
will work anyway, because it might be magically cleared to 0 by defining
it (it is static, and will probably be allocated to some place that is
26 matches
Mail list logo
