What would be the intent of the Wiki compared to the docs that need to
be generated in support of Beehive? What I've seen locally is the wikis
become a place to do informal documentation regarding code, process,
chat, etc.
What would we put in this potential Beehive wiki that shouldn't be in
I'm not seeing this problem
Just did an update on trunk.
ant clean
ant deploy
Looks good to me.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Zachary Smith
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 12:52 PM
To: beehive-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: build failure?
I get the following when trying to build
+1
The only question is when?
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Heather Stephens
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 12:46 PM
To: Beehive Developers
Subject: Ant upgrade?
Hey crew -
Ant 1.6.2 is available. (http://ant.apache.org/)
Does anybody object to doing an upgrade from 1.6.1?
H.
My personal feeling is we should try to stay up to date as much as
possible with patch/minor point releases. While I agree they come
frequently, if we stay on them the changes are usually predictable.
As for major jumps like Tomcat 5 to Tomcat 6, especially when Tomcat 6
is new, I feel we should
I'm syncing now. I'll do this if someone hasn't beaten me to it.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Osborne
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 10:04 AM
To: Beehive Developers
Subject: TR fix for multi-webapp playback
Hi All,
There is a bug in the multi-webapp TR playback where the
I'm working on getting this in now.
Should be there in a few minutes.
Thanks Patrick.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Osborne
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 12:09 PM
To: Beehive Developers
Subject: Re: Netui check-in request
Eddie thanks for reviewing the code. I synced and
+1
-Original Message-
From: Heather Stephens
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 10:14 AM
To: Beehive Developers
Subject: RE: [Proposal] Pre-V1 release for ApacheCon?
5 of 24 committers voted.
5 of 5 voted +1.
Of those 24 committers, around 50% are actively participating.
Rotan, Ias,
for ApacheCon?
Sorry for the late response...
+1
-Original Message-
From: Steven Tocco
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 10:58 AM
To: Beehive Developers
Subject: RE: [Proposal] Pre-V1 release for ApacheCon?
+1
-Original Message-
From: Heather Stephens
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 10:14
Steve,
Julie Zhuo noticed change 56616
56616
steveh
Removing README.txt from the Dashboard sample to avoid duplication with
the live site. Adding README.txt to the main samples folder, telling
users to go to the live site for all samples info. (Will re-evaluate the
location of the
Julie,
I'll take care of this, please get me the source though; I think you
left it off the email.
Thanks
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Julie Zhuo
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 11:51 AM
To: Beehive Developers
Subject: A Check In Request -- A patch for Beehive Distribution Test
This
!
Julie
-Original Message-
From: Steven Tocco
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 11:57 AM
To: Beehive Developers
Subject: RE: A Check In Request -- A patch for Beehive Distribution Test
Julie,
I'll take care of this, please get me the source though; I think you
left it off the email.
Thanks
+1
Sounds like a good thing to do now rather than later.
-Original Message-
From: Eddie O'Neil
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 12:14 PM
To: Beehive Developers
Subject: important: build changes
All--
As have been discussed in the -dev list over the last few weeks,
there are some
+1
_
From: Nikhil Gore
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 5:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; beehive-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sending CruiseControl Emails to beehive-dev mailing list
Hello Everyone,
As people
Heather,
I'd like to sponsor two people to gain JIRA rights.
I understand no vote is necessary for this action, just shown
contribution and sponsorship form a committer.
Jeremiah Johnson has been looking at the Beehive programming model and
has been active in terms of feedback and submitting
Heather,
I'd like to propose Karen Stutesman to have rights within JIRA. While I
know no vote is necessary for this action, it is still our policy to
sponsor candidates for these rights on this list.
Karen has been testing XHTML/HTML compliance and Tree tag in Beehive and
has shown
Heather,
I'd like to propose Jason Dunckley having JIRA access rights. Jason has
been actively testing aspects of NetUI around validation and popups.
While I know no formal vote is needed for this action, it is our process
to declare this type of sponsorship on this list.
Thanks
+1
-Original Message-
From: Eddie O'Neil
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 11:34 AM
To: dev@xmlbeans.apache.org
Cc: Beehive Developers
Subject: Re: FW: [ANN] XMLBeans 2.0.0-beta1, 1.0.4, 1.0.4-jdk1.3
available
Agreed; we'll take a new load of XMLBeans in the next few days.
Sound
+1
-Original Message-
From: Daryl Olander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 5:44 PM
To: Beehive Developers; Heather Stephens
Subject: Re: [vote] V1Beta Release on svn rev #159040
+1
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:27:17 -0800, Heather Stephens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Beehivers,
As we start to move towards V1 for Beehive, there is some needed
maintenance in JIRA.
Essentially, all issues at this time should be have Fix For Versions
listed in the Beehive filters as V1 or TBD.
V1 = Those issues needing to be fixed before Beehive 1.0 release.
TBD = For
Beehive Developers,
Now that we have gotten our second Beta approved, I thought it an
appropriate time to present what I feel are the release criteria for
Beehive 1.0.
I would expect the process around these to go as follows.
1) Present criteria (this email) and post the same on the wiki.
These have also been posted to the wiki here:
http://wiki.apache.org/beehive/V1ReleaseCriteria
Thanks
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Steven Tocco
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 2:43 PM
To: Beehive Developers
Subject: Proposed Release Criteria for Beehive 1.0
Beehive Developers,
Now
I suspect this work will be attached to a JIRA issue with the patch
file, additions, deletions.
Correct?
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Scott Semyan
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 10:44 AM
To: Beehive Developers
Subject: Pending JPetStore Checkin
I have a pending checkin to the
* in netui/test/webapps/drt (tests of NetUI running
against Struts 1.1)
*drt.myfaces* in netui/test/webapps/jsf (tests of NetUI/JSF
integration using MyFaces)
*drt.jsf-ri* in netui/test/webapps/jsf (tests of NetUI/JSF
integration using the JSF Reference Implementation)
Rich
Steven Tocco
it. To run the drt.jsf-ri test, you need to set the JSF_HOME
environment variable to a directory that contains the RI. MyFaces is
included in the tree, and that's OK because it's another Apache
project.
Rich
Steven Tocco wrote:
Rich,
I think I'm ok with this, but have a few questions.
Would
Should we file a CR to this effect and mark for TBD?
I suspect we should. Only question is it against the scripts or a
bigger issue?
Thanks
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Osborne
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 10:59 AM
To: Eddie O'Neil
Cc: Beehive Developers
Subject: Re:
This is great. Thanks Eddie.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Eddie O'Neil
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:31 AM
To: Beehive Developers
Subject: nightlies
All--
I'll be doing work over the next day or so to produce Beehive
nightlies which will be available from:
Eddie/Others,
Do we have any idea when it will be made available?
Or are you suggesting taking it now, even with vote pending?
Thanks
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Che [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 7:10 AM
To: Beehive Developers
Subject: Re: upgrading
+1
Others, please give a quick response.
Thanks
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Eddie O'Neil
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 10:23 AM
To: Beehive Developers
Subject: [proposal] move the system controls from controlhaus to Apache
All--
I'd like to propose that we move the code /
I think this is awesome. Would love to see some energy around
checkstyle (or similar tool).
One of the hardest parts about getting checkstyle rolled out is getting
agreement on the style xml config file, which enforces the rules via reg
expressions and other rules. People get so excited about
I think this is a sound plan. It allows us to keep momentum and gets
good bits to people early and often.
+1
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Eddie ONeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 5:30 PM
To: Beehive Developers
Subject: planning for future beehive releases
+1
-Original Message-
From: Richard Feit
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 9:21 PM
To: Beehive Developers
Subject: Re: [vote] cleaning up jira by renaming v1 to v1m1
+1
Eddie ONeil wrote:
All--
In the course of releasing Beehive 1.0 v1m1, we overloaded the use
of the V1 release Fix
Eddie,
I think this looks great. Having them decoupled will be good for the
future.
Thanks
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Eddie ONeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 3:16 PM
To: Beehive Developers
Subject: new beehive website
All--
I've got a new version of
Eddie,
Thanks for kicking this off.
In support of the v1 release, I've put together some release criteria
and posted them to the wiki.
http://wiki.apache.org/beehive/V1ReleaseCriteria
These are similar to those we used for v1m1, but with a few minor edits.
Please let me know if you have any
33 matches
Mail list logo
