Re: [Newbies] array literal - a misunderstanding?

2007-03-05 Thread Thomas Fischer
Hi, The Terse guide to Squeak at http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5699 may help. Thanks for this Link. Arrrgh! There is no curly brace in the Terse guide salute Thomas -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/array-literal---a-misunderstanding--tf3344098.html#a9316617 Sent from

Re: [Newbies] array literal - a misunderstanding?

2007-03-05 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On Mar 5, 2007, at 18:48 , Thomas Fischer wrote: Hi, The Terse guide to Squeak at http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5699 may help. Thanks for this Link. Arrrgh! There is no curly brace in the Terse guide It's a wiki. Add it. - Bert - ___

Re: [Newbies] array literal - a misunderstanding?

2007-03-04 Thread Mathieu Suen
Is because the #(..) array is a literal build at compile time. If you want a flat array use the {} syntax. But this is specific to Squeak. You will not find it in VW for example. Rather prefer the Array class#with:with:with: Math On Mar 4, 2007, at 10:47 PM, Thomas Fischer wrote:

RE: [Newbies] array literal - a misunderstanding?

2007-03-04 Thread Ron Teitelbaum
Hi Thomas, The #() syntax is for a regular array but for a literal array you want {} (curly braces) Try this: {1. 2. 1 + 3.} Hope that helps, Ron Teitelbaum From: Thomas Fischer Hello list, I'm starting for a couple of days with smalltalk/squeak - maybe it's not my last post :)