Oleg Kobchenko wrote:
load 'viewmat'
...
From experience with HTML colors and BMP byte layout
for 24 bit encoding, as well as in GL2, for example,
glcolor 256 (#.^:_1) 16bff
256 (#.^:_1) 16bff
255 0 0
this should be RED. But it's not what we see in viewrgb.
I would
I have increased the limit on the length of #! script arguments for
linux and mac. It is not easy to make it dynamic and I have settled on
just increasing it to about 3 for the total length of the command
line argument. This command line is passed to J as a sentence something
like:
Thanks! That sounds like a great improvement and I shall
verify it at first opportunity.
I certainly hope this also removes the no man's land that
caused an incorrect result as described below - maybe harder
to test.
- joey
At 17:15 -0400 2006/06/21, Eric Iverson wrote:
I have increased the
I'm afraid the no mans land of wrong results are still possible for
'very long arguments'. I don't intend to pursue it at this time.
- Original Message -
From: Joey K Tuttle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Beta forum beta@jsoftware.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Jbeta]
The following gives an unexpected result
(,7) -. ,7
(,7)-./_ 0 ]7 11
0
7
--
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
Fraser Jackson wrote:
The following gives an unexpected result
(,7) -. ,7
(,7)-./_ 0 ]7 11
0
7
I don't understand?
What is unexpected here?
Are you surprised that 0 is the fill element for
numeric arrays?
--
Raul
Henry Rich wrote:
so the result should be rank 2 1 with the first item being filled.
I think you meant ..should be rank 1 with...
If nothing else, noun rank is always a scalar.
--
Raul
--
For information about J forums see
Hmmm, that's too bad. In general, I would rather have a
crash than an incorrect/incomplete result...
- joey
At 17:30 -0400 2006/06/21, Eric Iverson wrote:
I'm afraid the no mans land of wrong results are still possible
for 'very long arguments'. I don't intend to pursue it at this time.
shape 2 1
Henry Rich
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Raul D
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 6:10 PM
To: Beta forum
Subject: RE: [Jbeta] Bug in -./
Henry Rich wrote:
so the result should be rank 2 1 with the first item
Fraser Jackson wrote:
No, but using a numeric fill causes a clearly incorrect answer
if 0 is a possible element of the difference set. I think there
is a real problem with using a fill element of 0 for this case.
Ok.
(0 2 3)(@ -.) /_1 0 ] 0 2 4
adds boxing which gives correct
10 matches
Mail list logo
