Thank you, Chris.
It's actually under Directory Paths
http://www.jsoftware.com/books/help/user/dirpaths.htm
I was initially tried to locate something with Folders
in the name.
Just to confirm one thing, which is still not clear:
if there are different folders in 'user' and 'User',
will the
Oleg Kobchenko wrote:
Just to confirm one thing, which is still not clear:
if there are different folders in 'user' and 'User',
will the latter override in the call below?
jpath '~user/folder/file.ext'
No, folder names are case-sensitive.
Attempting to form edit the folloing script results in an error in
wdhandler:
error in: form_g_paint
value error:draw
(d_index(fns)~d
NB. obeta
9!:12''
6
9!:14''
j601/beta/2006-06-10/20:00
TST=: 0 : 0
pc tst closeok nomax;pn Test;
xywh 59 8 50 11;cc edit;
pas 6
Don Guinn wrote:
TST=: 0 : 0
pc tst closeok nomax;pn Test;
xywh 59 8 50 11;cc edit;
pas 6 6;pcenter;
rem form end;
)
I guess it is the 2 spaces after that causes error, it should be a single
space only. What form editor saved is always well-formed, so did you manually
edit the
I don't have any problem with your tst script when run in a clean J
session. The form_g_paint and the rest of your problem report seem to be
related to a form with an isigraph control. Please try your tests again
and possibly provide additional info.
- Original Message -
From: Don
UGH. Bill's reply made it clear how completely I had misunerstood your
rather clear bug report. The form editor should not be this sensitive
and it will be fixed.
- Original Message -
From: Don Guinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Beta forum beta@jsoftware.com
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 8:37
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jose Mario Quintana
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 3:18 PM
To: 'Beta forum'
Subject: RE: [Jbeta] Incorrect result shape from 5 +1 (0 1 $' ')
X=. 5 [ Y=. 0 1$' '
plus=. +
plus1=. plus1
Jose Mario Quintana wrote:
X=. 5 [ Y=. 0 1$' '
plus=. +
plus1=. plus1
X (plus1 f. -: plus1) Y
0
Until recently I naively assumed that the above should not happen.
It seems to me that the DoJ text for the 'f.' entry,
If x is a proverb, then y=: x f. is equivalent to it,
