Re: [Jbeta] isigraph demo on linux

2008-02-22 Thread bill lam
This morning, running pacman from the new n beta, the version of its script is newer than than that of JAL, (6.02.020 vs 6.02.018), but it allows running 'do install'. Is this intended? Chris Burke wrote: Thanks, I cleaned this up in the latest JAL scripts. The paint demo needed updating, and

Re: [Jbeta] isigraph demo on linux

2008-02-22 Thread Chris Burke
bill lam wrote: This morning, running pacman from the new n beta, the version of its script is newer than than that of JAL, (6.02.020 vs 6.02.018), but it allows running 'do install'. Is this intended? We cannot always update JAL before a distribution, since the scripts may have changes that

Re: [Jbeta] isigraph demo on linux

2008-02-22 Thread Raul Miller
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Chris Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We cannot always update JAL before a distribution, since the scripts may have changes that depend on changes to the J engine. After the distribution is made, JAL can be updated, as happened already today. However, this is

Re: [Jbeta] isigraph demo on linux

2008-02-22 Thread Oleg Kobchenko
Since you enjoyed the Paint demo, you might be interested in the media/paint addon. http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Addons/media/paint --- Brian Schott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ric's mentioning of this demo triggered my discovering this demo and especially the Paint Demo. I was

Re: [Jbeta] isigraph demo on linux

2008-02-21 Thread Brian Schott
In my last post I forgot to mention that when the Saveas dialog appears for the Paint Demo, the File Format drop down button has no options at all. (B=) -- For information about J forums see