Behalf Of Roger Hui
By the way, a particular application failed to
run because a J6 empty vector turned out not to
be 'identical' to the corresponding J5 empty
vector and it was difficult to see, via their
linear representation, that they were actually
different in some sense.
@jsoftware.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:06 PM
Subject: RE: RE: [Jbeta] Linear Representation
OK, I'm warned... just get the 5!:5 result right and I'll
take responsibility for using it :) Anyway, I can't
use 3!:n to talk to release 5, so I have no choice.
Henry Rich
-Original Message
It comes down to whether there is one empty vector
or more than one empty vector. (*)
(i.0) -: ''
1
(i.0) -: ''
1
(i.0) -: u: i.0
1
3!:0 i.0
4
3!:0 u: i.0
131072
I will probably change 5!:5 to preserve the
distinction between i.0 and '' without answering
(*) one way or the other.
Jose Mario Quintana wrote:
By the way, a particular application failed to run because a
J6 empty vector turned out not to be 'identical' to the
corresponding J5 empty vector and it was difficult to see,
via their linear representation, that they were
actually different in some sense.
When
It is best to use 3!:x to exchange between machines
or to recover values in a session with perfect
fidelity.
- Original Message -
From: Henry Rich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 6:16 pm
Subject: RE: RE: [Jbeta] Linear Representation
I know I encountered this problem
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Hui
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 9:26 PM
To: Beta forum
Subject: Re: [Jbeta] Linear Representation
It is best to use 3!:x to exchange between machines
or to recover values in a session
Well, don't say I didn't warn you.
- Original Message -
From: Henry Rich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 6:34 pm
Subject: RE: [Jbeta] Linear Representation
With respect, I disagree. 3!:x changed for release 6, for
example. As new datatypes are added, 5!:5 seems
Henry Rich wrote:
With respect, I disagree. 3!:x changed for release 6, for
example. As new datatypes are added, 5!:5 seems to me less
likely to break. (This is not an academic issue: I have
to keep J5.04 running to use it for DDE)
There is a script for dde in jwiki
] On Behalf Of bill lam
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:13 PM
To: Beta forum
Subject: Re: [Jbeta] Linear Representation
Henry Rich wrote:
With respect, I disagree. 3!:x changed for release 6, for
example. As new datatypes are added, 5!:5 seems to me less
likely to break
