Yes, panel grouping was one of the nicest things in 2.4x. I also got
the feeling that 2.5 dropped (at least by now) some nice gui features
and concept and reduced more to a standard set of features well known
from established mainstream gui toolkits.
What I also dislike are the new check boxes, I
Selon Jason Millis bakenb...@gmail.com:
First bring back panel grouping. This feature was essential in
horizontal layouts and can reduce scrolling.
Ho, yes !! +1
This one too. And not only for the horizontal layouts.
jms
___
Bf-committers mailing
My .01 cents is that on netbooks, the horizontal layout is actually
preferable since I can get most of the panels on screen, then full
screen to make use of my 3D view. Also I think we should make some
effort to allow users of previous versions of Blender to migrate a bit
more easily. Other
i have an idea for the horizontal layout (i am not sure though if
somebody came up with this before already).
why not simply make every column which is too long scrollable
individually when horizontal alignment is enabled? should i make a
quick mockup or is it clear what i mean? i think this
So to sum it up, there are several ways of grouping panels. One for
e.g. that both are visible a time and another one, where you have
tabs. The question is, do we want to decide on one or should be both
included?
Aurel
2009/12/9 horace grant horac...@gmail.com:
i have an idea for the horizontal
: Re: [Bf-committers] 2.5 UI font
To: bf-committers@blender.org
Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 6:25 PM
Hi,
bill...@me.com
(2009-12-09 at 0014.49 +0100):
Three possible solutions I can think of:
1: remove horizontal layout - use vertical instead
2: keep it as-is to ease transition
--- On Wed, 12/9/09, Damir Prebeg damir_pre...@yahoo.com wrote:
What amuses me is argumentation that horizontal layout is
bad since we had to scroll because of high panels like
Mirror Transp or Modifier stack. Yep, right. In current
vertical layout we don't have to scroll at all.
What
Is there some logical reason why all this time is being spent reinventing
the wheel making a GUI toolset when there are perfectly good libraries that
currently do the job, ie. PyGTK and PyQT? Having it all done in openGL is
nice for performance, portablity to mobile devices, transparent overlays -
QT is wonderful but it can't do what Blender can with the inputs and I
for one would miss that. I also love blender because it is the fastest
loading and starting software that I have and the most responsive. I
bet we would loose all that with QT. PyQT has a restrictive licence
but QT is good.
On
Knapp kirjoitti:
bet we would loose all that with QT. PyQT has a restrictive licence
but QT is good.
This is getting offtopic, but just so that you know, there is also
PythonQt which is actually made for embedding like done in Blender. We
are using it in our Ogre network client app,
Hi all,
I'm the jackass who scream bloody murder, everywhere on the internet
to get the old UI font back.
Ok, this was not the appropriate way to get positive
feeback, i apologize.
There is too much pressure on the coding team,
and i should have posted here a more constructive and
friendly
2009/12/8 dw...@free.fr:
Hi all,
I'm the jackass who scream bloody murder, everywhere on the internet
to get the old UI font back.
The fact is that i can't use Blender with this new UI,
and i won't... but i need it... for my work... funny!
10 years of proselytism to promote Blender, and
Hi All,
First, the goal of my firts post was only
to find helpfull tricks and keys to tweak
the UI by myself...
Now, my reply (or attenpt to) to Nathan
(please don't quote or follow if you disagree,
it's useless and time consuming)
Well, i must admit that the new UI, and its
new font look
On 8.12.2009, at 14.37, dw...@free.fr wrote:
to design issues or inconsistencys.
With the new design, the horizontal layout
for buttons does not work well, thats
a fact and was planned.
I see your point with the AA-fonts. I too am quite a heavy Blender user and
think that the non-AA
I haven't played with this, but isn't it solvable by disabling AA past a
certain font size? Windows and OS X do this.
~ C
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Mats Holmberg mats.holmb...@2me.fi wrote:
On 8.12.2009, at 14.37, dw...@free.fr wrote:
to design issues or inconsistencys.
With
layout can't just put all of them side by side.
Martin
--- On Tue, 12/8/09, Erwin Coumans erwin.coum...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Erwin Coumans erwin.coum...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] 2.5 UI font
To: bf-blender developers bf-committers@blender.org
Received: Tuesday, December 8, 2009, 11
for horizontal layout based on the flexibility of
content.
---Original Message---
From: William Reynish
Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] 2.5 UI font
Sent: 08 Dec '09 23:14
Hi,
I'm not quite following this debate.
First of all, horizontal properties are still available: [LINK:
http
I would say the best thing then is to find a way to display the header
without the need to scroll?
How about 2 rows of buttons for the header that will help cut down on
the scrolling.
Or we could try a vertical row of buttons somewhere.
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 08:23 +0200, Mats Holmberg wrote:
18 matches
Mail list logo
