On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 01:15:58PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeff Pang writes:
Hello,
I need to let apache start/stop named.
I set: chmod +s named, so httpd (run with nobody) can stop/start it.
Is it safe for this behavior? thanks.
In general,
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Jeff Pang wrote:
I need to let apache start/stop named.
I set: chmod +s named, so httpd (run with nobody) can stop/start it.
Is it safe for this behavior? thanks.
How does your named listen on network socket?
Can you use rndc reconfig or rndc reload instead?
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeff Pang writes:
Hello,
I need to let apache start/stop named.
I set: chmod +s named, so httpd (run with nobody) can stop/start it.
Is it safe for this behavior? thanks.
In general, no. Named is not designed to be run suid root.
A ordinary
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeff Pang writes:
Hello,
I need to let apache start/stop named.
I set: chmod +s named, so httpd (run with nobody) can stop/start it.
Is it safe for this behavior? thanks.
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jeremy C. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: is it safe to chmod +s named?
To: Jeff Pang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: bind-users@isc.org
Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2008, 10:06 PM
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Jeff Pang wrote:
I need to let apache start/stop named.
I set
