Hi,
Are we going to get the missing xml libs in this release for windows?
:statistics-channels specified but not effective due to missing XML
library
Thanks,
Ian
Tester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I replicate 2 zones between a W2K3 server and Unix Bind 9 server, each
zone is primary zone on each of the boxes above. W2K3 has an AD
integrated zone that gets replicated to Unix and Unix has a Bind 9
zone that gets replicated to windows. How can I make
Ian Tait wrote:
Hi,
Are we going to get the missing xml libs in this release for windows?
:statistics-channels specified but not effective due to missing XML
library
Thanks,
Ian
I'm going to try and get that in soon. I've been busy with some other work.
Danny
We've added one training event* to the schedule at the USENIX meeting in
San Diego.
Here's the complete schedule:
ISC will host it's annual DHCP Forum meeting (BoF) on Tuesday, November
11th from 7-9pm at LISA in San Diego. We will be presenting the DHCP
roadmap and have an open discussion about
REporting problem in bind-9.4.3rc1
Nov 10 07:47:31 gallifrey named[2940]: starting BIND 9.4.3rc1
Nov 10 07:47:31 gallifrey named[2940]: found 1 CPU, using 1 worker thread
Nov 10 07:47:31 gallifrey named[2940]: using up to 1024 sockets
Nov 10 07:47:31 gallifrey named[2940]: loading configuration
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 07:51:14AM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
REporting problem in bind-9.4.3rc1
Nov 10 07:47:31 gallifrey named[2940]: starting BIND 9.4.3rc1
Nov 10 07:47:31 gallifrey named[2940]: found 1 CPU, using 1 worker thread
Nov 10 07:47:31 gallifrey named[2940]: using up to 1024
At Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:51:14 -0700,
The Doctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
REporting problem in bind-9.4.3rc1
- Which operating system (and version) are you using?
- Have you seen this in 9.4.2-P2 or 9.4.3b[1-3], too?
- Does that change if you specify a small number for the
reserved-sockets
At Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:14:22 -0700,
The Doctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Which operating system (and version) are you using?
- Have you seen this in 9.4.2-P2 or 9.4.3b[1-3], too?
- Does that change if you specify a small number for the
reserved-sockets option in named.conf, e.g, like
Mark Andrews wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jonat
han Petersson writes:
I recall someone mentioning the bind has the functionality of loading old
revisions of a zone-file when using dynamic updates. Is this correct? If yes
how is this done?
Thanks
/Jonathan
named
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Kevin Darcy wrote:
I was going to mention the journalprint utility, but it appears it's
been removed :-( Last sighting was 9.3.2 in the bin/tests directory.
Anyone know what happened to it? Was it not considered useful enough to
maintain?
I still see it.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kevin Darcy writes:
Mark Andrews wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], J
onat
han Petersson writes:
I recall someone mentioning the bind has the functionality of loading old
revisions of a zone-file when using dynamic updates. Is this correct? If y
es
I act as a slave for one client. He is growing his business to the
point where I am finding it too laborious to add his slave zones all
the time. I can script it a bit so I am just pasting in a list of
domains, but I wonder if there is not a provision in named for this
already.
Is there
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Kevin Darcy wrote:
I was going to mention the journalprint utility, but it appears it's
been removed :-( Last sighting was 9.3.2 in the bin/tests directory.
Anyone know what happened to it? Was it not considered useful enough to
maintain?
Scott Haneda wrote:
I act as a slave for one client. He is growing his business to the
point where I am finding it too laborious to add his slave zones all
the time. I can script it a bit so I am just pasting in a list of
domains, but I wonder if there is not a provision in named for
14 matches
Mail list logo
