[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Danny Mayer wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to install BIND 9.5.0-P1 over 8.4.6 without
uninstalling 8.4.6 first?
The test machine has problem uninstalling 8.4.6, so I do not know if
the production machine will have the same problem. So it would
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we are not using rndc to control BIND 9, is there any harm NOT
configuring rndc.conf and relevant entry in named.conf?
TIA
No.
Danny
Vinny Abello wrote:
-Original Message-
From: JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H(B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 12:38 AM
To: Vinny Abello
Cc: bind-users@isc.org
Subject: Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption
At Thu, 7 Aug 2008 00:26:04 -0400,
Vinny Abello wrote:
Hi everyone,
I noticed some odd behavior with BIND 9.5.0-P2 in regards to memory
utilization when being tested using dnsperf. The memory usage just
continually climbs and never levels out. I've done this with both queries
that require recursion as well as queries with
Radim Hajek wrote:
Hello,
after upgrading bind to last 9.5.0-P1 on one of our Windows 2003
server BIND starts crashing several times a day.
Faulting application named.exe, version 0.0.0.0, faulting module
ntdll.dll, version 5.2.3790.3959, fault address 0x0002a36b.
There are NO errors
Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
I (and others!) will be waiting for the next release of code and it is my
hope that it will *not* be release until the cause of this error is
thoroughly vetted and resolved.
I on the other hand wish to try and test any pre-release fixes, since there
really are no
Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
I get the same message in all our Windows server with P2, reported that a
week ago but haven't heard anything about it yet. Also the P2 crashes
several times a day even in a low-load server, hopefully the very soon to
be released fixed windows version is coming soon.
Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
I get the same message in all our Windows server with P2, reported that a
week ago but haven't heard anything about it yet. Also the P2 crashes
several times a day even in a low-load server, hopefully the very soon to
be released fixed windows version is coming soon.
Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
Danny Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti :
Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
I get the same message in all our Windows server with P2, reported that a
week ago but haven't heard anything about it yet. Also the P2 crashes
several times a day even in a low-load server, hopefully
JINMEI Tatuya / ç¥æéå wrote:
At Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:32:14 +0100,
Tom Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since upgrading from bind 9.3.0 to 9.5.1b1, the format of the statistics
file output has changed dramatically. The old format used to be;
[snip]
Is this expected behaviour and
Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Danny Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jukka Pakkanen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: bind-users@isc.org
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2008 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: 9.5.0-P2 under Win XP: warnings about the 'files' limit in
Event Log
Jukka Pakkanen
Vinny Abello wrote:
OK, this happened again. This time I noticed that BIND was not responding on
the primary IP bound to the server that it usually would previously respond
on. It kept answering queries on a secondary IP bound to the NIC however.
Again, nothing in the logs indicating any
: Danny Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 4:18 PM
To: Vinny Abello
Cc: bind-users@isc.org
Subject: Re: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding
Vinny Abello wrote:
OK, this happened again. This time I noticed that BIND was not
responding on the primary IP bound
Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
Ok, if it's not doable on W2K then it's not... just very unfortunate.
Guess there are quite a few W2K servers running BIND DNS, and upgrading
those to W2K3 is not always easy or cheap.
Jukka
It was not as simple as that. The problem was also a matter of ongoing
Vinny Abello wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Danny Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 9:22 PM
To: Vinny Abello
Cc: bind-users@isc.org
Subject: Re: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding
Well, that had no effect. Still seems to die pretty frequently. I
SpamList wrote:
I was reading through the release notes on the latest updates to BIND
9.4.x, and noticed that there is a note in there that Windows 2000 is no
longer being supported.
This leads me to two questions:
1) Does this mean that there are OS or API level features now being used
Vincent Poy wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Danny Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SpamList wrote:
I was reading through the release notes on the latest updates to BIND
9.4.x, and noticed that there is a note in there that Windows 2000
Leveillee, Jerry wrote:
Installed new release listed. Receive this error in event log...
.\socket.c:641: INSIST(err == 0) failed
Named service stops. Suggestions?
Upgrade to a later version of Windows. The minimum supported version of
Windows is Windows XP. See the release
Danny Mayer wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A very strange thing happened after upgrading from BIND 8.4.6 to 9.5.0.
We created the named user as a service account as required by BIND9,
then granted full control on everything in the BIND directory (d:\bind)
to this user, however the named
Mark Andrews wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rich
ard Wall writes:
2008/9/30 Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Rich
ard Wall writes:
snip
I've tried:
listen-on { 0.0.0.0; };
Which is listen-on { 0.0.0.0/32; }; which won't match any
Richard Wall wrote:
2008/10/1 Adam Tkac [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 11:28:25AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rich
ard Wall writes:
2008/9/30 Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Rich
ard Wall writes:
snip
Out of
Adam Tkac wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 11:28:25AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rich
ard Wall writes:
2008/9/30 Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Rich
ard Wall writes:
snip
I've tried:
listen-on { 0.0.0.0; };
Which is
Mark Andrews wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], arpad bind writes
:
Hello,
I have a problem with secure update via BIND 9.5 against Windows 2003 SP2 Dy
namic DNS service. DNS server is rejecting the updates. (Secure Updates from
MS clients works fine.)
I did these steps:
* GSS
Ian Tait wrote:
Hi,
Are we going to get the missing xml libs in this release for windows?
:statistics-channels specified but not effective due to missing XML
library
Thanks,
Ian
I'm going to try and get that in soon. I've been busy with some other work.
Danny
Mark Andrews wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ian Gregson writes:
Hi there,
I wonder if anyone can help. I notice on the web page it says compatible
with XP/2003 and 2008. but no mention of vista
Does the latest binaries work with vista??
Any help really appreciated
25 matches
Mail list logo
