Hello,
Using BIND 9.5.1 it seems that the nslookup command is not showing the
TTL value of found records. It makes no difference if I set 'debug' or
'd2'. Example:
==
nslookup
set debug
www.plymouth.ac.uk
Server: 127.0.0.1
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:06:56AM +0100, John Horne wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
Using BIND 9.5.1 it seems that the nslookup command is not showing the
TTL value of found records. It makes no difference if I set 'debug' or
'd2'. Example:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 10:47 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:06:56AM +0100, John Horne wrote:
How can I see the TTL value using nslookup?
I'm not sure how force nslookup to show TTL but the `dig` utility is
far more better tool for getting such information:
I agree,
Hi,
recently,i want to modify source code of BIND9.6.1 to adding new RR
.Now,i just begin to check RR to see how it work,but i find this method
exhausting me.i don't think this way is effective,so i'm very appreciate
some one could give me a guid, or some example:souce code is perfect
--
On 15.10.09 21:29, aihua zhang wrote:
recently,i want to modify source code of BIND9.6.1 to adding new RR.
Don't do that. You bind will be incompatible with any other DNS server and
it could lead to
Now,i just begin to check RR to see how it work,but i find this method
exhausting me.i
John Horne wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 10:47 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:06:56AM +0100, John Horne wrote:
How can I see the TTL value using nslookup?
I'm not sure how force nslookup to show TTL but the `dig` utility is
far more better tool for getting
In article mailman.715.1255626934.14796.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Kevin Darcy k...@chrysler.com wrote:
(Fortunately nslookup's whole won't do a lookup because I can't
reverse-resolve my resolver bogosity isn't really an issue at Chrysler,
since we maintain proper reverse mappings, but
You can do an ipconfig /displaydns to see some TTL info.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of John Horne
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 3:07 AM
To: Bind users
Subject: Nslookup not showng TTL
Hello,
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 13:15 -0400, Kevin Darcy wrote:
Removing features from nslookup gets us that much closer to KILLING and
BURYING it. Forever.
So why does the ISC still distribute it?
(Although I guess the answer may simply be because people still use
it.)
Don't get me wrong here -
On 15-Oct-2009, at 16:03, John Horne wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 13:15 -0400, Kevin Darcy wrote:
Removing features from nslookup gets us that much closer to KILLING
and
BURYING it. Forever.
So why does the ISC still distribute it?
(Although I guess the answer may simply be because
In message 20091015135428.ga19...@fantomas.sk, Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
On 15.10.09 21:29, aihua zhang wrote:
recently,i want to modify source code of BIND9.6.1 to adding new RR.
Don't do that. You bind will be incompatible with any other DNS server and
it could lead to
As long as
In message 76d7097b-28a4-4bbb-a2c8-05bf5b822...@conundrum.com, Matthew Pounse
tt writes:
On 15-Oct-2009, at 16:03, John Horne wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 13:15 -0400, Kevin Darcy wrote:
Removing features from nslookup gets us that much closer to KILLING
and
BURYING it. Forever.
Kevin Darcy wrote:
John Horne wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 10:47 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:06:56AM +0100, John Horne wrote:
How can I see the TTL value using nslookup?
I'm not sure how force nslookup to show TTL but the `dig` utility is
far more
13 matches
Mail list logo