At Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:09:12 -0400,
Gerry Scott gscot...@gmail.com wrote:
Backtrace executes successfully on the latest build of OpenSolaris for SPARC
(snv_125) with gcc version 3.4.6
# uname -a
SunOS nemesis 5.11 snv_125 sun4u sparc SUNW, 5-slot Sun Enterprise E3500
# gcc -v
Reading
Is it possible to have a A record for *.domain.com
I know *.domain records works for MX records , not sure wether they work
for A records
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 04:01:31PM +0530,
ram r...@netcore.co.in wrote
a message of 10 lines which said:
Is it possible to have a A record for *.domain.com
Technically, yes. It is a very bad idea, but it works.
I know *.domain records works for MX records , not sure wether they
work for A
The tsig manual page description for ns_sign() and ns_verify() include a
parameter named in_timesigned of type time_t. However there is no
description of this parameter as there is for the others:
$ less libbind-6.0/doc/tsig.cat3
TSIG LOCAL
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, net...@royal.net wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to dump all Bind cache's content into a file?
Thanks.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
rndc dumpdb
--
David
Thanks.
Can I change bind cache's content?
-Original Message-
From: David Forrest d...@maplepark.com
To: net...@royal.net
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Mon, Oct 26, 2009 8:05 pm
Subject: Re: dump cache's content
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, net...@royal.net wrote:
Hello,
The documentation for ns_find_tsig() is confused looking at
libbind-6.0/doc/tsig.cat3:
TSIG LOCALTSIG
NAME
ns_sign, ns_sign_tcp, ns_sign_tcp_init, ns_verify, ns_verify_tcp,
ns_verify_tcp_init, ns_find_tsig -- TSIG system
On 26.10.09 08:08, net...@royal.net wrote:
Can I change bind cache's content?
you can remove objects via rnds flushname name.
You can't forge cache content without modifying BIND source or playing with
process' memory.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
http://www.rfc-archive.org/getrfc.php?rfc=4592
This link should help you.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:17 AM, ram r...@netcore.co.in wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 11:39 +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 04:01:31PM +0530,
ram r...@netcore.co.in wrote
a message of 10
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:00 -0700
From: JINMEI Tatuya / ...@l@C#:H(B jin...@isc.org
1. build 9.7.0b1
2. go to the bind-9.7.0b1/bin/tests directory
3. % make backtrace_test
4. % ./backtrace_test
metis% uname -a
SunOS metis 5.9 Generic_122300-31 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-1
metis% make
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 05:47:57PM +0530,
ram r...@netcore.co.in wrote
a message of 20 lines which said:
If wildcard DNS is a bad idea,
Wildcards *address* records (A and ), not all wildcards.
See http://www.icann.org/committees/security/ssac-report-09jul04.pdf
or
JINMEI,
OpenSolaris build 125 includes execinfo.h within the /usr/include directory.
Also, backtrace() functionality has been included within the OS since build
63.
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6536146
Regards,
Gerry Scott
President and Principal Engineer
WAN
Hey! RTFRFC! :-)
Except a scanning of that RFC doesn't say anything about not using them,
only in clarifying RFC 1034's intentions regarding wildcards.
So, why is it a very bad idea?
Peter
Mike Ragusa wrote:
http://www.rfc-archive.org/getrfc.php?rfc=4592
This link should help you.
On
Hi:
I have a name server running named on a closed network. The root
servers name my node and another node (running DNS on a sidewinder
firewall) as authoritative for our domain as well as several
subdomains. Two of the subdomains have their own servers, and we
configured our (allegedly
Lawrence MacIntyre wrote:
Hi:
I have a name server running named on a closed network. The root
servers name my node and another node (running DNS on a sidewinder
firewall) as authoritative for our domain as well as several
subdomains. Two of the subdomains have their own servers, and we
In message 4ae5c6cc.8020...@ou.edu, Peter Laws writes:
Hey! RTFRFC! :-)
Except a scanning of that RFC doesn't say anything about not using them,
only in clarifying RFC 1034's intentions regarding wildcards.
So, why is it a very bad idea?
Peter
What is legal and what works well are
In message 4ae58fd9.8020...@sun.com, Stacey Jonathan Marshall writes:
The tsig manual page description for ns_sign() and ns_verify() include a
parameter named in_timesigned of type time_t. However there is no
description of this parameter as there is for the others:
$ less
17 matches
Mail list logo
