Re: confused wiht the full resolver and stub resolver

2009-11-17 Thread Chris Buxton
On Nov 16, 2009, at 11:46 PM, aihua zhang wrote: HI, Thanks for your help! Now I'm analysis the lib function providing by the bind . bind software has three data format:struct format, wire format and the text format, from my understanding, it presents the RR in different three

Split view logging?

2009-11-17 Thread John Horne
Hello, Using BIND 9.5.1, is it possible to configure split view logging - that is, a separate logging channel/category for different views? I'm trying to separate out the queries of our local clients from the external ones. Thanks, John. -- John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK Tel: +44

Re: Split view logging?

2009-11-17 Thread Chris Buxton
On Nov 17, 2009, at 7:02 AM, John Horne wrote: Hello, Using BIND 9.5.1, is it possible to configure split view logging - that is, a separate logging channel/category for different views? I'm trying to separate out the queries of our local clients from the external ones. No, not using

Re: Problema Bind 9.6.1 CentOS 5.3

2009-11-17 Thread Kevin Darcy
Luiz Ricardo Olicio wrote: Hi guys! We have some DNS servers with BIND version 9.6.1-P1 and we have some problems to resolve domain addresses. But to clear the cache (rndc-flush) they return to settle for some time. When the resolution gives error, we have the following message: ;;

Re: confused wiht the full resolver and stub resolver

2009-11-17 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 396ef6ed-a5a2-4c55-afd4-496b85278...@menandmice.com, Chris Buxton writes: On Nov 16, 2009, at 11:46 PM, aihua zhang wrote: HI, Thanks for your help! Now I'm analysis the lib function providing by the bind . bind software has three data format:struct format, wire

BIND Secondaries of MS AD Integrated Zones

2009-11-17 Thread jim.sifferle
Hi all, Most of our internal DNS zones are mastered in Microsoft DNS (2k3 R2) as AD Integrated zones. Currently, those zones are slaved from a single MS DNS server to our BIND 9 servers that handle recursion. Is there a reliable way to use multiple masters when slaving AD Integrated zones to

Re: BIND Secondaries of MS AD Integrated Zones

2009-11-17 Thread Chris Buxton
On Nov 17, 2009, at 5:01 PM, jim.siffe...@tektronix.com jim.siffe...@tektronix.com wrote: Hi all, Most of our internal DNS zones are mastered in Microsoft DNS (2k3 R2) as AD Integrated zones. Currently, those zones are slaved from a single MS DNS server to our BIND 9 servers that handle

Re: BIND Secondaries of MS AD Integrated Zones

2009-11-17 Thread Mark Andrews
In message b07d01c0-86c2-45e6-ac8e-6fc3472d9...@menandmice.com, Chris Buxton writes: On Nov 17, 2009, at 5:01 PM, jim.siffe...@tektronix.com jim.siffe...@tektr onix.com wrote: Hi all, Most of our internal DNS zones are mastered in Microsoft DNS (2k3 R2) as AD Integrated zones.

Re: BIND Secondaries of MS AD Integrated Zones

2009-11-17 Thread Chris Buxton
On Nov 17, 2009, at 8:27 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: multi-master true; still assumes correct zone serial number maintenance. It just prevents the warnings about serial number going backwards which is a normal side effect of having multiple masters vs a master with multiple addresses. OK, wow.