Mark,
thank you for this, it almost worked but put me on the right path.
In message 8761a2bbe915df46bb20e017c891e48ca...@ferrari.coherent.cohtech.co.uk
, Howard Wilkinson writes:
I am trying to build a package based on 9.6.1-P2. The target platform is a 32
-bit ix86 environment. The build
I made BIND work under windows. Now, I have some problem in finding
the proper configuration syntax for classes.
Cf. RFC 5395. http://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters
0xE000-0xFEFF
65280-65534Reserved for Private Use
Where is CLASS usage documented?
Thank you!
jfc
The default CLASS is IN (Internet). Unless you have a specific need to
use another class, then just leave CLASS empty and IN will cover all
of your typical name-resolution functions, e.g. name-address,
address-name, mail-domain-mail-exchangers, etc.
At 18:32 30/11/2009, Kevin Darcy wrote:
The default CLASS is IN (Internet). Unless you have a specific
need to use another class, then just leave CLASS empty and IN will
cover all of your typical name-resolution functions, e.g.
name-address, address-name, mail-domain-mail-exchangers, etc.
I understand that. But I need to use Private Use classes. The question
is how do I do it?
Use CLASS999 and similar identifiers (just like TYPE999 for types).
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
Dumb question perhaps, but does this patch serve any purpose if one is not
using DNSSEC?
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
From: Mike Bernhardt bernha...@bart.gov
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:19:44 -0800
Sender: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
Dumb question perhaps, but does this patch serve any purpose if one is not
using DNSSEC?
Dumb answer: looks like it only effects you if you are doing
validation. If you
JFC Morfin wrote:
At 19:36 30/11/2009, Florian Weimer wrote:
I understand that. But I need to use Private Use classes. The question
is how do I do it?
Use CLASS999 and similar identifiers (just like TYPE999 for types).
I guessed the format from the code. But it fails.
named-checkconf says
In message 20091130214313.9fff2114...@mx.isc.org, JFC Morfin writes:
At 19:36 30/11/2009, Florian Weimer wrote:
I understand that. But I need to use Private Use classes. The question
is how do I do it?
Use CLASS999 and similar identifiers (just like TYPE999 for types).
I guessed the
People who can read man pages can certainly read emails :-)
He was running named-checkconf, not named-checkzone.
It appears that the default view is locked to class IN, so if you need a
zone in another class, you need to define a view, even if trivially defined:
options {
directory /tmp;
};
At 23:19 30/11/2009, Kevin Darcy wrote:
It appears that the default view is locked to class IN, so if you
need a zone in another class, you need to define a view, even if
trivially defined:
options {
directory /tmp;
};
view blah class999 {
match-clients { any; };
zone foo class999 {
type
What's the main difference between zone and domain?
It's confusing to me,I'm searching though,i got once,zone is a portion of
domain.
Can someone give example to clear things up?
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
In message 402431.44413...@web112611.mail.gq1.yahoo.com, gmspro writes:
What's the main difference between zone and domain?
It's confusing to me,I'm searching though,i got once,zone is a portion of do
main.
Can someone give example to clear things up?
example.net.SOA ns.example.net.
On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:43 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message 402431.44413...@web112611.mail.gq1.yahoo.com, gmspro writes:
What's the main difference between zone and domain?
It's confusing to me,I'm searching though,i got once,zone is a portion of do
main.
Can someone give example to clear
14 matches
Mail list logo
