Thanks guys, sorry needed some down time to recharge my batteries - am
gona combine all answers into one lump mail :-)
Frank Pikelner wrote:
Do your bind logs give any clues as to what is going on? On the master
make sure you have read permission and the file is being loaded. On
the slave
In article mailman.1146.1259697520.14796.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
gmspro wrote:
What's the main difference between zone and domain?
In what context? Unfortunately both terms get used by various
people/vendors in different ways. A little more detail
In article mailman.1153.1259725836.14796.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Joseph S D Yao j...@tux.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 04:59:16PM -0800, Hans Jacobsen wrote:
If a.stanford.edu is a cname (say to b.stanford.edu)
can I delegate subdomain.a.stanford.edu? Are there documents that
Hello!
I can't find in docs how disable answer (Refused), if recursion for IP
is not allowed?
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
I found answer for my feature request - simple C proxer:
http://www.wolfermann.org/dnsproxy.html
It can forward queries to auth or recursion server. Based on client IPs.
FreeBSD port /usr/ports/dns/dnsproxy/
___
bind-users mailing list
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Dmitry Rybin kirg...@corbina.net wrote:
I found answer for my feature request - simple C proxer:
http://www.wolfermann.org/dnsproxy.html
It can forward queries to auth or recursion server. Based on client IPs.
What if one of your access customers is running
Dmitry Rybin wrote:
I found answer for my feature request - simple C proxer:
http://www.wolfermann.org/dnsproxy.html
It can forward queries to auth or recursion server. Based on client IPs.
So, what does a dnsproxy approach accomplish, that can't be achieved
with less processes, and less
I apologise, I should have tested - I appear to have been laboring under
a misconception and false mental model. I will check my resources to
see why I thought this.
--
/*\
**
** Joe Yao
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 10:02:45AM +0200, Kaya Saman wrote:
...
Joseph, yes definitely they are going to different files as I have 14
different zone files 7 in each 'view' - with 13 files getting
transferred..
...
This is good. But bad, in that would have been an easy solution.
This
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 12:47:08PM +, Sam Wilson wrote:
In article mailman.1153.1259725836.14796.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Joseph S D Yao j...@tux.org wrote:
[incorrectly]
No.
...
Not true. CNAME chains - CNAMEs pointing to other CNAMEs - are
inefficient and discouraged but the DNS
In article mailman.1165.1259775639.14796.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Joseph S D Yao j...@tux.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 12:47:08PM +, Sam Wilson wrote:
In article mailman.1153.1259725836.14796.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Joseph S D Yao j...@tux.org wrote:
[incorrectly]
No.
...
In article mailman.1159.1259764844.14796.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Dmitry Rybin kirg...@corbina.net wrote:
Hello!
I can't find in docs how disable answer (Refused), if recursion for IP
is not allowed?
What do you expect it to do instead? Not respond at all?
--
Barry Margolin,
In article mailman.1165.1259775639.14796.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Joseph S D Yao j...@tux.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 12:47:08PM +, Sam Wilson wrote:
In article mailman.1153.1259725836.14796.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Joseph S D Yao j...@tux.org wrote:
[incorrectly]
No.
...
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 12:59:51AM +0200, Kaya Saman wrote:
...
I just hope this doesn't take up many CPU cycles and memory as the debug
commands do in Cisco devices rendering them almost unusable in a fully
setup network environment.
...
I'm glad the logging helped!
Query logging can
Joseph S D Yao wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 12:59:51AM +0200, Kaya Saman wrote:
...
I just hope this doesn't take up many CPU cycles and memory as the debug
commands do in Cisco devices rendering them almost unusable in a fully
setup network environment.
...
I'm glad the
Major thanks Joseph
Added below:
// logging clause - who, what, where, why, when, how, how long?
logging {
channel querylog {
file /var/log/named/query.log versions 15 size 25m;
// severity debug;
severity info;
print-time yes;
print-category
when I read the RFC1035, I noticed the opcode defination in the DNS message
head . It said that when opcode = 1 the message did Inverse query . but in the
packet I capatured when I used nslookup to do inverse query ,the inverse query
packet use the opcode = 0 and the question segment with RR
when I read the RFC1035, I noticed the opcode defination in the DNS message
head . It said that when opcode = 1 the message did Inverse query . but in the
packet I capatured when I used nslookup to do inverse query ,the inverse query
packet use the opcode = 0 and the question segment with RR
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 10:42:38AM +0800, lipeng967 wrote:
when I read the RFC1035, I noticed the opcode defination in the DNS message
head . It said that when opcode = 1 the message did Inverse query . but in
the packet I capatured when I used nslookup to do inverse query ,the inverse
In message 4591889.164031259808158905.javamail.corem...@app183.163.com, lipen
g967 writes:
when I read the RFC1035, I noticed the opcode defination in the DNS
message head . It said that when opcode = 1 the message did Inverse query.
but in the packet I capatured when I used nslookup to do
Thank you very much for your help and advice .___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
21 matches
Mail list logo
