On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 02:55:08AM +0200,
Yanek hostmas...@abetternet.net wrote
a message of 42 lines which said:
1/ What is the bind record format for the zone itself?
Strictly speaking, it is not the BIND format but the standard format
(RFC 1035, section 5). However, not all name servers
On 21 Sep 2011, at 02:08, Kevin Oberman wrote:
dig confirms that .com had the glue for water.com.
As does dnscheck.iis.se.
Indeed, none of the test history (5 tests, today and yasterday)
archived for water.com at this site shows any delegation problem.
Only a
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 02:55:08AM +0200,
Yanek hostmas...@abetternet.net wrote
1/ What is the bind record format for the zone itself?
On 21.09.11 08:44, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
Strictly speaking, it is not the BIND format but the standard format
(RFC 1035, section 5). However, not all
2011/9/20 Drunkard Zhang gongfan...@gmail.com:
I got 4 DNSs doing recursive resolution, which splited into 2 groups,
and a couple of dns caches. Each group of recursion DNS using their
own net link, which is different.
Here's problem: I want a dns-cache to use one group of recursion DNS
as
2011/9/20 Drunkard Zhang gongfan...@gmail.com:
I got 4 DNSs doing recursive resolution, which splited into 2 groups,
and a couple of dns caches. Each group of recursion DNS using their
own net link, which is different.
Here's problem: I want a dns-cache to use one group of recursion DNS
as
I think it is safe to say the issue is the iis.se site is broken so far as
delegation test goes. Another user reported to me that he had several domains
return the same thing at this site.
Thanks everyone for the replies.
-Original Message-
From:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Niall O'Reilly niall.orei...@ucd.ie wrote:
On 21 Sep 2011, at 02:08, Kevin Oberman wrote:
dig confirms that .com had the glue for water.com.
As does dnscheck.iis.se.
Indeed, none of the test history (5 tests, today and yasterday)
I was the one asking about water.com. I'd started a separate thread hoping not
to tromp on the OP of the earlier thread but apparently didn't succeed.
I know the reason for the SOA/MX report so never asked about that.
I did ask about the delegation messages but at this point as noted earlier
Hi,
Is it possible to have one IP in multiple zone files for forward
lookups? What type of troubles would be encountered?
Larry
Lawrence Adamiec
Unix Manager/Web Support Specialist
Center for Law and Computers
Chicago-Kent College of Law
Illinois Institute of Technology
Room 525B
Yes, and none. FYI, traditionally PTR records contain only one hostname.
Doug
On 09/21/2011 12:56, Adamiec, Lawrence wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to have one IP in multiple zone files for forward
lookups? What type of troubles would be encountered?
Larry
Lawrence
Adamiec, Lawrence wrote:
Is it possible to have one IP in multiple zone files for forward
lookups? What type of troubles would be encountered?
Like, having www.example.com and ftp.example.org point to the same IP
address?
Yes, it's nothing weird about it.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
On Sep 21, 2011, at 12:56 PM, Adamiec, Lawrence wrote:
Is it possible to have one IP in multiple zone files for forward lookups?
Yes.
What type of troubles would be encountered?
None. This sort of thing is very commonly done, for example with
shared/virtual webservers.
Regards
--
-Chuck
On Sep 21, 2011, at 3:56 PM, Adamiec, Lawrence wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to have one IP in multiple zone files for forward lookups?
Yup, happens all the time:
example.com:
www.example.com. 600 IN A 192.0.2.1
example.net:
www.example.net. 600 IN A 192.0.2.1
foo:
www.foo.com.
One thing we do is create a single alias zone with generic information in it
to have multiple zones all go to the same IP.
Typically the main zone we'll put in its own zone file and have named.conf
associate that zone with that zone file.
For other zones we tell named.conf to point to the
I have couple of questions.
bind cache memory limit is 4GB. can I increase it. or this is hard-coded limit.
i'm running the x64 bit version.
also to increase the cache hit ratio I have created script to query my
dns for the top 1 million sites. would this give any performance
advantages or is
On 9/21/2011 5:00 PM, TMK wrote:
I have couple of questions.
bind cache memory limit is 4GB. can I increase it. or this is hard-coded limit.
i'm running the x64 bit version.
You can _try_ to raise that limit above 4Gb (see the various
configuration elements under Operating System Resource
On 9/20/2011 5:08 AM, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
I got 4 DNSs doing recursive resolution, which splited into 2 groups,
and a couple of dns caches. Each group of recursion DNS using their
own net link, which is different.
Here's problem: I want a dns-cache to use one group of recursion DNS
as their
On 21/09/11 17:30, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Are you running the Undelegated domain test or just the default
Domain test? Only the
Undelegated domain test is showing the error. It is still reporting it now.
This is pretty-well way out of scope for bind-users by now.
Thanks for
When I query a name, the dns-cache queries forwarders for gTLDs
instead of using local hint file, why?
local hint file? I'm not sure what you mean here.
This file just replace the original root-servers with all my 4
recursive DNS's domain name and IP, nothing other.
And the dns-cache does
Why are you going through all of these gyrations? The forwarding algorithm
in BIND has for a long time been based on RTT, so if one forwarder, or a set
of forwarders, stops working, the other(s) will be used automatically. In
other words, forwarder failover works without any special
20 matches
Mail list logo
