[ Not sure why this thread started on BIND-users:
please continue on DHCP-users! ]
On 18 Oct 2012, at 13:42, Dwayne Hottinger wrote:
I checked the mac addresses of these clients and thus far they are all ipads,
ipods or iphones.
We see BOOTP transactions here at UCD
Hello All,
I have gone thru the release note of BIND 9.8.0 to found that the feature *
dns64* has been implemented in this version of BIND for the first time. I
also learned that there are other features as well besides dns64.
Now, my task is to port dns64 in my BIND 9.7.3 (ported for ISC BIND
On 10/18/2012 3:17 PM, bind-users-requ...@lists.isc.org wrote:
Hi All,
I'm hopping to get some feedback from people who use ISC Bind and DHCPD in
Active Directory environments.
Currently we use Bind/DHCPD for dynamic DNS and DHCP. It's been a pretty
stable service, redundant and we are
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 02:30:12PM +0530, Ashok Agarwal wrote:
I have gone thru the release note of BIND 9.8.0 to found that the
feature * dns64* has been implemented in this version of BIND for
the first time. I also learned that there are other features as
well besides dns64. Now, my task
DDNS record scavenging is the only feature I'm aware of that MS DNS has that
Bind doesn't . On the flip side, ISC Bind can ACL who can add certain record
types to a dynamic zone using GSS-TSIG as well as supports views and ACLs for
recursion. Everything else should be standard DNS.
Nicholas F Miller nicholas.mil...@colorado.edu wrote:
DDNS record scavenging is the only feature I'm aware of that MS DNS has
that Bind doesn't . On the flip side, ISC Bind can ACL who can add
certain record types to a dynamic zone using GSS-TSIG as well as
supports views and ACLs for recursion.
Hello everyone,
Perhaps a Cisco list is a better destination for this, but I've seen a
similar post here in the past couple of months, so posting here as well.
I'm trying to get our Cisco ACE set up appropriately to handle DNS
traffic. So far, I've gotten it working using NAT (each rserver
Hi--
On Oct 19, 2012, at 11:25 AM, John Miller wrote:
Hello everyone,
Perhaps a Cisco list is a better destination for this, but I've seen a
similar post here in the past couple of months, so posting here as well.
I'm trying to get our Cisco ACE set up appropriately to handle DNS
IMO, the only boxes which should have IPs in both public and private netblocks
should be your firewall/NAT routing boxes.
That's how we usually have our servers set up--the load balancer gets
the public IPs, the servers get the private IPs, and we use NAT to
translate between the two.
On 10/19/12 1:25 PM, John Miller johnm...@brandeis.edu wrote:
Hello everyone,
Perhaps a Cisco list is a better destination for this, but I've seen a
similar post here in the past couple of months, so posting here as well.
I'm trying to get our Cisco ACE set up appropriately to handle
Hi--
On Oct 19, 2012, at 1:04 PM, John Miller wrote:
IMO, the only boxes which should have IPs in both public and private
netblocks should be your firewall/NAT routing boxes.
That's how we usually have our servers set up--the load balancer gets the
public IPs, the servers get the private
On Oct 19, 2012, at 13.27, Phil Mayers wrote:
Nicholas F Miller nicholas.mil...@colorado.edu wrote:
DDNS record scavenging is the only feature I'm aware of that MS DNS has
that Bind doesn't . On the flip side, ISC Bind can ACL who can add
certain record types to a dynamic zone using
On Oct 18, 2012, at 1:13 PM, Chris Thompson c...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
On Oct 18 2012, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Jack Tavares wrote:
I am running bind9.8.x built from source and I see this message in the logs
built with '--prefix=/blah' '--sbindir=/blah' '--sysconfdir=/blah'
While I can see maybe not being interested, caring enough to supress it has me
curious.
- Original Message -
From: Alan Clegg [mailto:a...@clegg.com]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 06:13 PM
To: bind-us...@isc.org bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: Disable log message
On Oct 18, 2012,
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com
Date: Friday, October 19, 2012 5:09 PM
To: John Miller johnm...@brandeis.edu
Cc: DNS BIND bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: transparent DNS load-balancing with a Cisco ACE
We're on a /16, so we have plenty of public IPs (though not
On Oct 19, 2012, at 6:13 PM, Alan Clegg a...@clegg.com wrote:
On Oct 18, 2012, at 1:13 PM, Chris Thompson c...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
On Oct 18 2012, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Jack Tavares wrote:
I am running bind9.8.x built from source and I see this message in the
-Original Message-
From: Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net
Date: Friday, October 19, 2012 8:56 PM
To: Alan Clegg a...@clegg.com
Cc: bind-us...@isc.org bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: Disable log message
On Oct 19, 2012, at 6:13 PM, Alan Clegg a...@clegg.com wrote:
On Oct 18, 2012, at
On Oct 19, 2012, at 9:17 PM, Michael Hoskins (michoski) micho...@cisco.com
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net
Date: Friday, October 19, 2012 8:56 PM
To: Alan Clegg a...@clegg.com
Cc: bind-us...@isc.org bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: Disable log
On Oct 19, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Oct 19, 2012, at 9:17 PM, Michael Hoskins (michoski)
micho...@cisco.com wrote:
-Original Message-
On Oct 19, 2012, at 6:13 PM, Alan Clegg a...@clegg.com wrote:
On Oct 18, 2012, at 1:13 PM, Chris Thompson c...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
19 matches
Mail list logo
