Re: clients-per-query increased to 15

2013-04-10 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 09.04.13 13:56, Dwayne Hottinger wrote: Ive started having some issues with one of my subnets. Im seeing messages like the following in my log files: clients-per-query increased to 15 This apply to recursive queries. Don't you have a malware on the network? If not, this is just an

clients-per-query

2013-04-10 Thread Dwayne Hottinger
I keep seeing messages in my named.log file that say things like clients-per-query increased to 30, then later it says clients-per-query decreased to a lower number. When this happens, lookups seem to not be working.What is an acceptable value for a large network? ddh -- Dwayne Hottinger

Re: clients-per-query

2013-04-10 Thread WBrown
From: Dwayne Hottinger dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us I keep seeing messages in my named.log file that say things like clients-per-query increased to 30, then later it says clients- per-query decreased to a lower number. When this happens, lookups seem to not be working.What is an

Re: clients-per-query

2013-04-10 Thread Dwayne Hottinger
Sorry, My spambox grabbed your earlier reply, my apologies.My clients are a mixed enviroment of macs,windows 7/xp, androids, etc. At any one time I'll have over 3000 devices connected to the network. I actually have one internal dns server for internal network and 2 external dns servers. I

Re: clients-per-query

2013-04-10 Thread WBrown
Dwayne Hottinger dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote on 04/10/2013 10:27:24 AM: Sorry, My spambox grabbed your earlier reply, my apologies.My clients are a mixed enviroment of macs,windows 7/xp, androids, etc. At any one time I'll have over 3000 devices connected to the network.

Re: clients-per-query

2013-04-10 Thread Dwayne Hottinger
3000 devices isn't much, even for a modest BIND server. Did this configuration work in the past? What changed? Is there a network rate limiting device in place that could be affecting the queries to the authoritative servers? Have you talked to your networking team? They would never make

Re: reverse resolution failing

2013-04-10 Thread Jim Pazarena
Jim Pazarena wrote, On 2013-02-07 9:31 AM: my named is 9.9.0 while it can resolve webmail.acrodex.com ( 139.142.184.10 ) it cannot reverse resolve 139.142.184.10 (example follows). However, if I do a simply nslookup using goodle DNS. nslookup 139.142.184.10 8.8.8.8 IT WORKS! So I have

Re: reverse resolution failing

2013-04-10 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 10.04.13 13:07, Jim Pazarena wrote: So I have another domain which will not reverse resolve for me: mail.tysers.com which also appears to be: mail.tyser.co.uk 80.169.188.226 the IP, will not reverse resolve (for me) yet, once again, google (8.8.8.8) CAN RESOLVE IT. On my original post,

Re: reverse resolution failing

2013-04-10 Thread Chuck Swiger
Hi-- On Apr 10, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote: So I have another domain which will not reverse resolve for me: mail.tysers.com which also appears to be: mail.tyser.co.uk 80.169.188.226 the IP, will not reverse resolve (for me) yet, once again, google (8.8.8.8) CAN RESOLVE IT.