I just remembered there was also the change to the db file
having a default raw format on slaves unless specified.
Interesting. I did not notice that when it happened, but now that I
look, I see that my slaves indeed have raw format files. Apparently
the switch over did not require me to do
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Schulz sch...@adi.com
Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 at 9:50 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
I just remembered there was also the change to the db file
having a default raw format on
Hello friends,
I may sound like novice but have basic question regarding Sub-zone which is
an delegated zone. lets say I have zone example.com whose NS are
ns1.example.com and then I have delegated sub-zone subdom.example.com whose
ns record would be say ns2.example.com.
So people who will be
A freshly started server with no cache will be directed to nd1 first which
will give a referral to ns2 for the subdomain. After that it will go to ns2
directly until the ns records time out in cache.
On Jan 23, 2014 12:30 PM, Blason R blaso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello friends,
I may sound like
Perfect this is what I m thinking. So in some case I observed that
subdomain.example.com has ns record specified but no A record associated
with it. But if i do query set type=ns to parent ns record it shows
something else.
Like
Set typ=ns
Sybdom.example.com
Ns5.example.com
Set type=a
Are there any recommended practices/config changes needed when upgrading
or restoring a bind 9.9.4 server using DNSSEC inline signing and auto
maintain?
Asking specifically about upgrading a server running on NanoBSD, but
this question is really about upgrading or restoring any DNSSEC server
with
In article mailman.2135.1390499953.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Blason R blaso...@gmail.com wrote:
Perfect this is what I m thinking. So in some case I observed that
subdomain.example.com has ns record specified but no A record associated
with it. But if i do query set type=ns to parent ns
On Jan 23, 2014, at 9:54 AM, Mike Hoskins (michoski) micho...@cisco.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Schulz sch...@adi.com
Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 at 9:50 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
I just
It's hard to see exactly what the problem is since you didn't use a real
domain that we can look at, or even if the example matches what you're
really seeing.
But, continuing the bad example further...
if the situation is more like:
set type=ns
sybdom.example.com
Hi there,
Is that possible to use the bind-util “nsupdate” to insert a new record into
the zone file of response policy zone ? I got “NOTZONE” reply from the bind. I
tried by using the following commands but still got “NOTZONE” status code
replied from Bind. Have anyone ever tried to build
I think you need to change the line ..
update add test.thingsto.me. 60 A 127.0.0.1
... to ...
update add test.thingsto.me.rpz A 127.0.0.1
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Pika.Aman a...@thingsto.me wrote:
Hi there,
Is that possible to use the bind-util nsupdate to insert a new record
11 matches
Mail list logo
