Le 14/05/2024 à 15:08, DEMBLANS Mathieu a écrit :
Hello,
I have a question about configuration simplification for SRV
configuration (maybe it can be applyed for other entries).
We manage multiple subdomain of a main one (server1.example.com,
server2.example.com,…).
For A and MX entries,
Le 10/07/2023 à 21:54, Richard T.A. Neal a écrit :
Jul 10 19:49:07 flons3 named[1140]: /etc/bind/named.conf.logging:147:
undefined category: 'delegation-only'
Jul 10 19:49:07 flons3 named[1140]: loading configuration: failure
Jul 10 19:49:07 flons3 named[1140]: exiting (due to fatal error)
Le 07/07/2023 à 11:57, Jakob Bohm via bind-users a écrit :
On 2023-06-02 05:02, Jesus Cea wrote:
On 2/6/23 4:25, Mark Andrews wrote:
Yep, some people just don’t take care with delegations. Complain to
Huawei.
Complain to the other companies you list in your followup email.
All it takes to
Le 17/04/2023 à 20:40, Petr Menšík a écrit :
Ondřej,
it would be awesome if we could choose a higher quality release
instead to use for our longer support. But we lack any good metric to
choose one. So we update from time to time unless there is something
stopping us.
How could you
Le 22/12/2022 à 14:30, Jesus Cea a écrit :
I have a validating DNSSEC bind server. I get AD (Authenticated Data)
flag when requesting details from a DNSSEC protected domain. Good.
The point is that when the requested DNS name belongs to a domain with
this server is authoritative and that
Le 19/12/2022 à 20:06, BÖSCH Christian a écrit :
Hello,
I have two bind dns servers as client resolvers with local zones and
for the rest
configured forwarders. The root zone “.” and hints file is commented out.
In the connection logs on the firewall I see a lot of connections from
the
Current ESV : 9.16.35
No, your release is not patched.
Add the ISC PPA repo and install the latest ESV. ISC PPA packaged are
packaged by the same maintainers.
Le mer. 7 déc. 2022, 23:02, Ben Bridges a écrit :
> Ubuntu 20.04.5 is LTS and BIND 9.16 is the current stable ESV release, so
> they’re
on.
Thank you very much in advice,
Dmitri.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users On Behalf Of Ondrej Surý
Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2022 7:48 PM
To: Emmanuel Fusté
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2
What Emmanuel said…
--
Ondřej Surý
Le 04/08/2022 à 17:48, Dmitri Pavlov a écrit
Therefore, a very small request. Would it be possible on your side to run the same
experiment as with (BIND 9.16.32 / BIND 9.18.6 / BIND 9.19.4) one more time but
with BIND 9.16.21 (or any other version in 9.16.x <25 range )?
Why not the opposite
ng hours may be different. Please do not feel
obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.
On 13. 5. 2022, at 15:30, Emmanuel Fusté wrote:
Hello,
I've had a hard time identifying the source of intermittent name
resolution failure for a customer.
The source of the problem is a DNS spec
Hello,
I've had a hard time identifying the source of intermittent name
resolution failure for a customer.
The source of the problem is a DNS spec violation with a RRSET with
multiple CNAME:
dig @ns-29-b.gandi.net CNAME lb.qual.flash-global.net
; <<>> DiG 9.18.2-1+ubuntu20.04.1+isc+3-Ubuntu
11 matches
Mail list logo
