Re: BIND Secondaries of MS AD Integrated Zones

2009-11-18 Thread bsfinkel
jim.siffe...@tektronix.com wrote: Most of our internal DNS zones are mastered in Microsoft DNS (2k3 R2) as AD Integrated zones. Currently, those zones are slaved from a single MS DNS server to our BIND 9 servers that handle recursion. Is there a reliable way to use multiple masters when slaving

BIND Secondaries of MS AD Integrated Zones

2009-11-17 Thread jim.sifferle
Hi all, Most of our internal DNS zones are mastered in Microsoft DNS (2k3 R2) as AD Integrated zones. Currently, those zones are slaved from a single MS DNS server to our BIND 9 servers that handle recursion. Is there a reliable way to use multiple masters when slaving AD Integrated zones to

Re: BIND Secondaries of MS AD Integrated Zones

2009-11-17 Thread Chris Buxton
On Nov 17, 2009, at 5:01 PM, jim.siffe...@tektronix.com jim.siffe...@tektronix.com wrote: Hi all, Most of our internal DNS zones are mastered in Microsoft DNS (2k3 R2) as AD Integrated zones. Currently, those zones are slaved from a single MS DNS server to our BIND 9 servers that handle

Re: BIND Secondaries of MS AD Integrated Zones

2009-11-17 Thread Mark Andrews
In message b07d01c0-86c2-45e6-ac8e-6fc3472d9...@menandmice.com, Chris Buxton writes: On Nov 17, 2009, at 5:01 PM, jim.siffe...@tektronix.com jim.siffe...@tektr onix.com wrote: Hi all, Most of our internal DNS zones are mastered in Microsoft DNS (2k3 R2) as AD Integrated zones.

Re: BIND Secondaries of MS AD Integrated Zones

2009-11-17 Thread Chris Buxton
On Nov 17, 2009, at 8:27 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: multi-master true; still assumes correct zone serial number maintenance. It just prevents the warnings about serial number going backwards which is a normal side effect of having multiple masters vs a master with multiple addresses. OK, wow.