On Dec 15 2009, Evan Hunt wrote:
(Doug Barton wrote)
BIND 9.6.2 is in the b1 phase atm, which means that there is plenty
of time to get SHA2 in there and get the release out before a signed
root goes live. I encourage the folks at ISC to do so, and if you
agree I encourage you to make your
We hear you. Expect a decision in the next few days.
So, has the decision been made?
[I am tentatively planning on going to 9.7 in production round about Easter,
in good time for the RSASHA256-signed root zone in July, but it would be
nice to have a fall-back option.]
I'm sorry, I
On Dec 15 2009, Doug Barton wrote:
While this reminder is timely and helpful, more welcome would be the
news that BIND 9.6.2 is going to have actual support for
RSASHA{256|512}. My cursory reading of the 9.6.2b1 code does not seem
to indicate that it does, although I would be happy to be proven
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 08:05:40PM -0800,
Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote
a message of 44 lines which said:
While this reminder is timely and helpful, more welcome would be the
news that BIND 9.6.2 is going to have actual support for
RSASHA{256|512}.
No, it won't. Migrating to =
Chris Thompson wrote:
(Evan Hunt)
Adding SHA-2 to 9.6.x would violate our policy of making major
functional changes only in major releases, so I don't expect we'll
do that. Given the odd circumstances you mentioned, I won't say for
certain that we won't--but I doubt it.
9.7.0 is going to
Evan Hunt wrote:
BIND 9.6.2 is in the b1 phase atm, which means that there is plenty
of time to get SHA2 in there and get the release out before a signed
root goes live. I encourage the folks at ISC to do so, and if you
agree I encourage you to make your voice heard.
We hear you.
That's
BIND 9.6.2 is in the b1 phase atm, which means that there is plenty
of time to get SHA2 in there and get the release out before a signed
root goes live. I encourage the folks at ISC to do so, and if you
agree I encourage you to make your voice heard.
We hear you. Expect a decision in the
In message prayer.1.3.2.0912151543550.32...@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk, Chris Tho
mpson writes:
(But it's not too obvious to me that adding support for a new signing
algorithm should necessarily be considered a major functional change.)
If it was *just* adding a new signing algorithm then yes it
While this reminder is timely and helpful, more welcome would be the
news that BIND 9.6.2 is going to have actual support for
RSASHA{256|512}. My cursory reading of the 9.6.2b1 code does not seem
to indicate that it does, although I would be happy to be proven wrong.
I personally don't think it's
9 matches
Mail list logo
