On Dec 28, 2011, at 8:56 PM, Chris Buxton wrote:
On Dec 24, 2011, at 4:50 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Dec 25 01:39:02 storage000 named[29649]: lame-servers: info: error
(network unreachable) resolving 'www4.l.google.com//IN':
2001:503:231d::2:30#53
Dec 25 01:40:10 storage000
Sorry to come into the conversation late, but I've been on vacation.
On Dec 24, 2011, at 4:50 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Dec 25 01:39:02 storage000 named[29649]: lame-servers: info: error (network
unreachable) resolving 'www4.l.google.com//IN': 2001:503:231d::2:30#53
Dec 25 01:40:10
Hello *,
my Inttranet NameServer (my DNS-Master) was running Debian Lenny/5.0 and
is now upgraded to Debian Squeeze/6.0 and et I get per day very huge
named.log files, because:
[ '/var/log/named.log' ]
Dec 25 00:21:01 dns named[29004]:
Did the BIND version change with the OS upgrade?
-Ben Croswell
On Dec 24, 2011 6:38 PM, Michelle Konzack linux4miche...@tamay-dogan.net
wrote:
Hello *,
my Inttranet NameServer (my DNS-Master) was running Debian Lenny/5.0 and
is now upgraded to Debian Squeeze/6.0 and et I get per day very
Hello Ben Croswell,
Am 2011-12-24 18:42:09, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Did the BIND version change with the OS upgrade?
Yes.
I had this problem some years ago:
8--
Mark Andrews marka at isc.org
Tue Aug 3 22:32:29 UTC
For soem seconds I have read a message (not from me) where someone asked,
whether forwarders where configured and do not accept queries...
So I have removed my forwarders and restarted bind9:
--[ '/var/log/named.log' ]--
Dec 25 01:36:09 storage000
6 matches
Mail list logo
