In message 7737.1316035...@tristatelogic.com, Ronald F. Guilmette writes:
In message 7d9b265c-36bf-40c1-9012-ac0a96fb8...@sackheads.org, you wrote:
On Sep 14, 2011, at 4:35 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Is there a rule that says how a resolver should behave in cases where
there is
On Sep 14, 2011, at 5:09 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
In message cf550bd6-ba85-4cb3-8b03-e4e1b0829...@mac.com, you wrote:
Sigh: your mail server is blacklisting email from mac.com.
Yes. Sorry about that. Too much spam from there and no indication
that anybody there gives a damn that that
In message 39634800-7e01-4878-b1a1-cf384c8a6...@mac.com,
Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
On Sep 14, 2011, at 5:09 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
In message cf550bd6-ba85-4cb3-8b03-e4e1b0829...@mac.com, you wrote:
Sigh: your mail server is blacklisting email from mac.com.
Yes. Sorry
Last night, it appeared to me that nslookup was resolving the name
graphiteops.com to IP address 72.52.4.95.
Today however it is no longer doing that, reporting instead:
% 127.0.0.1
Address:127.0.0.1#53
Non-authoritative answer:
graphiteops.com canonical name = graphiteops.com.
On Sep 14, 2011, at 4:35 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Is there a rule that says how a resolver should behave in cases where
there is both an A record and also a CNAME record for the same FQDN?
Which one should take precedence, the A or the CNAME?
RFC 1034, Section 3.6.2: If a CNAME RR is
In message 7d9b265c-36bf-40c1-9012-ac0a96fb8...@sackheads.org, you wrote:
On Sep 14, 2011, at 4:35 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Is there a rule that says how a resolver should behave in cases where
there is both an A record and also a CNAME record for the same FQDN?
Which one should take
On Sep 14, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
The second part however seems to go more to my question, which is What is
the resolver supposed to do when some knucklehead breaks the rules and puts
a CNAME in with some other stuff?
Depends on which query one issued. The very next
fields:
Message-id: 2be47d87-8417-4055-8466-f47cd7fdb...@mac.com
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:52:34 -0700
From: Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com
To: Ronald F. Guilmette r...@tristatelogic.com
Subject: Re: Proper CNAME interpretation
Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients
On 9/14/2011 5:52 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Sep 14, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
The second part however seems to go more to my question, which is What is
the resolver supposed to do when some knucklehead breaks the rules and puts
a CNAME in with some other stuff?
Depends on
In message cf550bd6-ba85-4cb3-8b03-e4e1b0829...@mac.com, you wrote:
Sigh: your mail server is blacklisting email from mac.com.
Yes. Sorry about that. Too much spam from there and no indication
that anybody there gives a damn that that they gush spam. (If you
find anybody who does care,
10 matches
Mail list logo
