Huh?
sftp uses secure transport as does scp and both use the same keys as
ssh. I can see no way in which ftps would be viewed as superior.
Exactly how are you losing RSA keys and if you do aren't you more
concerned that you can no longer ssh into the box?
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 21:10 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello. I have two geographically different datacenters. Each
datacenter has two instances of BIND.
There is one master out of these four. The zones will have multiple
A records (pointing to the two datacenters to provide some
What we used to do is we had 2 masters. After an update was done on one of
them, we ran a perl script that would scp the db files to the other and then
send rndc reload to itself and the other master. That way both were always
up to date. It seems like if you had one master and one slave at each
better to use an ftps then an sftp.
use
vsftpd with SSL compile option
GNU lftp
lftp is really simple and can be configured to bypass RSA CA verify sso to
allow selfsigned and many other settings.
The difference is that if you lose RSA keys or in all cases, using the RSA
keys to allow SCP,
4 matches
Mail list logo
