Re: SPF records in reverse zones?

2012-12-06 Thread WBrown
Dan Mahoney wrote on 12/05/2012 06:52:43 PM: I can't even imagine what spamfilters would think of such an address. :) To quotes some annoying TV ads here in the US: REJECTED! Confidentiality Notice: This electronic message and any attachments may contain confidential or

Re: SPF records in reverse zones?

2012-12-06 Thread WBrown
Karl Auer wrote on 12/05/2012 06:44:01 PM: This may be a silly question, but are SPF records supposed to be supported in reverse zones? I'm thinking of a mail server that has no entry in the DNS. THe SPF query is looking for the sender's domain, not the sender's server, so the record would

Re: SPF records in reverse zones?

2012-12-05 Thread Dan Mahoney
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Karl Auer wrote: This may be a silly question, but are SPF records supposed to be supported in reverse zones? I'm thinking of a mail server that has no entry in the DNS. Well, most mail servers will reject such a server (i.e. one with NO rdns). However, there's another

Re: SPF records in reverse zones?

2012-12-05 Thread Barry Margolin
In article mailman.818.1354751059.11945.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, Karl Auer ka...@biplane.com.au wrote: This may be a silly question, but are SPF records supposed to be supported in reverse zones? I'm thinking of a mail server that has no entry in the DNS. Many anti-spam rules block mail

Re: SPF records in reverse zones?

2012-12-05 Thread Mark Andrews
In message alpine.bsf.2.00.1212052345240.58...@bikeshed.isc.org, Dan Mahoney w rites: On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Karl Auer wrote: This may be a silly question, but are SPF records supposed to be supported in reverse zones? I'm thinking of a mail server that has no entry in the DNS. Well,