Re: UDP Packet Hack

2016-06-22 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Jun Xiang X Tee wrote: > (1) Does "dig" get its UDP packets from "named" server? Or "lwresd" server? > Or others? If you use the @server argument, it gets it from that server. Otherwise, it gets it from

Re: UDP Packet Hack

2016-06-22 Thread Tony Finch
Jun Xiang X Tee wrote: > > For the past two weeks, I have searched through many articles online > and asked many people on how to do this, but I am still confused on > where "dig" gets the UDP packets from. It sounds like you should start off with a good DNS textbook, such as

Re: UDP Packet Hack

2016-06-21 Thread Warren Kumari
Sorry, but isn't this almost exactly the same question which you asked in: https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2016-June/097012.html ("Append a Hard-coded Text Tuple into Additional Section of "dig" Feature") ? And "Query "resolver" and "lwresd" via "dig"" ? Perhaps if you explained what

RE: UDP Packet Hack

2016-06-21 Thread John W. Blue
(1) Does "dig" get its UDP packets from "named" server? Yes. tcpdump -n -i lo0 port domain $ dig www.allpowerlabs.com 20:36:28.073280 IP 127.0.0.1.10588 > 127.0.0.1.53: 18890+ A? www.allpowerlabs.com. (38) 20:36:28.210557 IP 127.0.0.1.53 > 127.0.0.1.10588: 18890 1/3/3 A

Re: UDP Packet Hack

2016-06-21 Thread Karl Auer
On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 01:06 +, Jun Xiang X Tee wrote: > I am working on hacking UDP packets returned to "dig" client. I > wish to include some extra information about the "digged" domain > (e.g., facebook.com) at Additional Section of "dig" reply in TXT > format. The ideal result is to be