Re: Status of experimental COPR packages

2019-09-09 Thread Victoria Risk
>> We did recently start setting up another site, Cloudsmith.io, for >> some of our packages. We need a site we can control for non-public >> stuff, like the BIND subscription edition, and private patches, and >> Cloudsmith allows us to put packages for multiple different OSes in >> one repo. I

Re: Status of experimental COPR packages

2019-09-09 Thread John Thurston
On 9/6/2019 12:10 PM, Victoria Risk wrote: I really like what I'm seeing with the COPR distribution: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/isc/ The description there still states "..USE AT YOUR OWN RISK.” John- Do you still see those messages? I don’t see them. I thought I removed all

Re: Status of experimental COPR packages

2019-09-06 Thread Victoria Risk
> On Sep 6, 2019, at 10:18 AM, John Thurston wrote: > > Back in Sept, 2018 we got word of packages published by ISC for a few common > linux distributions. > https://www.isc.org/blogs/bind-9-packages/ > > There have been a couple of trickles of news on this mailing list since then. > I'm

Status of experimental COPR packages

2019-09-06 Thread John Thurston
Back in Sept, 2018 we got word of packages published by ISC for a few common linux distributions. https://www.isc.org/blogs/bind-9-packages/ There have been a couple of trickles of news on this mailing list since then. I'm interested in the prospects, plans, etc for these packages. I