inverse query:PTR RR or OPCODE=1 ?

2009-12-02 Thread lipeng967
when I read the RFC1035, I noticed the opcode defination in the DNS message head . It said that when opcode = 1 the message did Inverse query . but in the packet I capatured when I used nslookup to do inverse query ,the inverse query packet use the opcode = 0 and the question segment with RR

inverse query:PTR RR or OPCODE=1 ?

2009-12-02 Thread lipeng967
when I read the RFC1035, I noticed the opcode defination in the DNS message head . It said that when opcode = 1 the message did Inverse query . but in the packet I capatured when I used nslookup to do inverse query ,the inverse query packet use the opcode = 0 and the question segment with RR

Re: inverse query:PTR RR or OPCODE=1 ?

2009-12-02 Thread Joseph S D Yao
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 10:42:38AM +0800, lipeng967 wrote: when I read the RFC1035, I noticed the opcode defination in the DNS message head . It said that when opcode = 1 the message did Inverse query . but in the packet I capatured when I used nslookup to do inverse query ,the inverse

Re: inverse query:PTR RR or OPCODE=1 ?

2009-12-02 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 4591889.164031259808158905.javamail.corem...@app183.163.com, lipen g967 writes: when I read the RFC1035, I noticed the opcode defination in the DNS message head . It said that when opcode = 1 the message did Inverse query. but in the packet I capatured when I used nslookup to do

Re: inverse query:PTR RR or OPCODE=1 ?

2009-12-02 Thread lipeng967
Thank you very much for your help and advice .___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users