when I read the RFC1035, I noticed the opcode defination in the DNS message
head . It said that when opcode = 1 the message did Inverse query . but in the
packet I capatured when I used nslookup to do inverse query ,the inverse query
packet use the opcode = 0 and the question segment with RR
when I read the RFC1035, I noticed the opcode defination in the DNS message
head . It said that when opcode = 1 the message did Inverse query . but in the
packet I capatured when I used nslookup to do inverse query ,the inverse query
packet use the opcode = 0 and the question segment with RR
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 10:42:38AM +0800, lipeng967 wrote:
when I read the RFC1035, I noticed the opcode defination in the DNS message
head . It said that when opcode = 1 the message did Inverse query . but in
the packet I capatured when I used nslookup to do inverse query ,the inverse
In message 4591889.164031259808158905.javamail.corem...@app183.163.com, lipen
g967 writes:
when I read the RFC1035, I noticed the opcode defination in the DNS
message head . It said that when opcode = 1 the message did Inverse query.
but in the packet I capatured when I used nslookup to do
Thank you very much for your help and advice .___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
5 matches
Mail list logo