Hi, Dough--
On Dec 21, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 12/16/2010 14:48, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi, bind-users--
I'd recently updated a machine to FreeBSD 7-STABLE, and I've noticed
that named from the base system (which claims to be BIND 9.4-ESV-R4)
is using more than twice as much
You're combining too many variables. Whilst on the same platform
(presumably FreeBSD 7) install dns/bind94, run your tests. Then
deinstall that, and install dns/bind96; then run your tests.
I suspect that what you're seeing is actually a problem in BIND 9.4,
irrespective of platform. The
On Dec 21, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
You're combining too many variables. Whilst on the same platform (presumably
FreeBSD 7) install dns/bind94, run your tests. Then deinstall that, and
install dns/bind96; then run your tests.
I suspect that what you're seeing is actually a
Hi, bind-users--
I'd recently updated a machine to FreeBSD 7-STABLE, and I've noticed that named
from the base system (which claims to be BIND 9.4-ESV-R4) is using more than
twice as much memory as it used to:
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND
706
4 matches
Mail list logo
